几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 12:54 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 masonry wall design - axial stress

masonry wall design - axial stress
per msjc 2005 section 3.3.5.4 - equations apply to wall with factored axial stress of .20 *fm or less.
my question is - what happens when the axial stress is greater than .20*fm?
this was previously addressed in the msjc 2002 which stated deflection criteria applied to walls with axial stress greater than .05*fm and less than .20*fm. per section 3.2.5.5. (msjc 2002) - walls with axial stress greater than .20*fm shall be designed in accorance with provisions of section 3.2.5.4 which references strength design. (similar to axial stress less than .05*fm) with no deflection requirements.
can anyone offer any insight on this? possibly i'm missing something very basic.
thanks!

one additional item that i forgot to add...
msjc 2005 commentary reads: "there are currently no strength design provisions for axial stress greater than .20*fm."
does this mean wall thickness or fm must be increased if axial stress is greater than .20fm for strength design?
i've reviewed the mdg-5 by the national masonry society as well and they simply state "no guidance is given for axial stress greater than .20fm"
our firm had previously used the provisions in the 2002 code to design walls with axial stress greater than .20fm. possibly this isn't allowed anymore?
as it states "no strength design provisions", have you considered asd design?
yes, i have considered asd - it is too conservative for this example.
this wording in the code is very unclear to me for the following reasons:
1. previously (in aci 530-02) deflection design and p-delta effects need only be considered for walls with axial stress beteen .05fm and .20fm. why is this not considered for walls with greater than .20fm?
2. in aci 530-05 they revise the above statement to check deflection for all axial stress less than .20*fm and give no direction for axial stress over this limit.
3. what is the purpose of the .20*fm axial check? slenderness is already included in the pn equations. it seems the .20fm would always control and there would be no reason to check your pn. (therefore vertical rebar would not contribute to your compressive strength)
my question is this - if you have an interior wall with negligible (10 psf) lateral load. do you still need to be held to the .20*fm stress limit? this equation falls under the "out of plate loads" section so i'm not sure.
this does seem a little odd. every wall must be checked for out-of-plane loads. even interior walls as you mention.
yes, you have to still meet the 0.2*f'm. you have to use asd for your example.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
in enercalc masonry wall design, what is parapet heigh huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:17 PM
high masonry wall design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 04:22 PM
existing masonry wall and sliding foundation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 08:55 AM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
concrete basement wall design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:39 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:19 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多