几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 04:22 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 high masonry wall design

high masonry wall design
i am doing a structural design of a 3-storey with roofdeck reinforced concrete building. the building is irregularly shaped and a portion of the structure is to have an l-shaped footprint of masonry wall (which will serve as firewall) with dimensions of 7.5m by 10m and height of 14m from ground. the masonry wall stands vertically upright with no roof/truss above it. i would like to know:
a.) if there are special design consideration for this type of wall aside from gravity and lateral loads due to wind.
b.) what frame system is appropriate for this considering that the wall is situated within the perimeter and only cantilever footing and wall footing is possible?
thank you and i hope anyone can help me on this.

this is a cantilevered 45ft high masonry wall exposed to exterior wind?
the wall does not seem to be a major design problem for a reinforced masonry or concrete element. i have seen several similar walls built for large masonry homes in russia.
the plan dimensions (7.5 m x 10m) of the "l" shaped element relative to the height (14 m) provide a relatively robust structural element. the torsion will make it somewhat interesting depending on your simplifying assumptions.
i assume the element will be partially reinforced masonry (for descriptive purposes). critical portions will be the vertical steel at the ends of the walls and somewhat at the wall intersection. obviously, some intermediate bond beams(8" or 16" deep) will be required for shear depending on the wind/seismic loadings).
the vertical steel and grout spacing in the "field" of the wall will be relatively widely spaced.
constructability of the design will be critical. concerns should be selection of masonry unit shape, spacing of bond beams and selection of masonry unit strengths and grout strengths. if your local code still requires visual observation/clean-outs, this will be a factor.
avoid the primative approach of dumping the wall full of high strength grout into every core to create a robust structure. - it is unprofessional sign, wasteful and contrary to good engineering. the grout strength should not greatly exceed the masonry unit strength. - you want the outer fibers (the masonry) to be stronger than the core fill material that does not see the stresses.
dick
what is the out of plane load?
thanks for the reply.
the element will be partially reinforced masonry with columns and bond beams intermediately spaced. i am thinking of having the columns and beams as my primary system (to resist gravity and horizontal loads - wind or eq). do you think this is a good approach? i am trying to eliminate stresses on masonry because high strength blocks is not available in our locality.
haynewp,
yes cantilevered about 45ft exposed to minimal wind because adjacent to it is a 5-storey bldg. earthquake will probably be considered because of the wall height. no other loads on the wall other than its selfweight.
why do you think you need high strength block? - you are not building a 20 story building out of 6" block are you? an "l" shape structure is reasonably efficient.
a mixture of columns, bond beams and masonry is very inefficient compared to an element designed out of masonry. the minute you break a strucrual element up into microscopic elements of units, mortar, beams and columns, you are adding complexity and assumptive errors.
look to aci 530 and treat the "l" shaped wall as another structural element.
you must design the wall as if the other 5 story building is not there. don't shield it from wind forces due to the presence of that structure. things could change. buildings are torn down resulting in vacant lots. cya.
mike mccann
mccann engineering
that seems awfully tall to be free standing and exposed to full wind load. why can't you tie it to the structure for stability?
at each leg end is already the bldg structure also at same height. yes, it will be tied together since it will also serve as the building perimeter fence and fire wall.
thank you everyone for your reply. its very helpful.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
existing masonry wall and sliding foundation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 08:55 AM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
concrete basement wall design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:39 AM
27 feet high brick 9clay0 masonry wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:33 AM
20 high basement wall and diaphragm huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:23 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:04 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多