几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 02:04 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 correct column tie spacing

correct column tie spacing
i have been inspecting rebar and pt installations for over a decade and i have the icc reinforced concrete special inspector certificate. i have previously worked for a premier structural engineer in the se as shop drawing review and field inspection. now i work for a testing lab doing primarily field inspection work. even with all of my experience there are a number of things about rebar installation and drawings that bug me and i want to ask you structural guys and gals about them. for instance鈥?.
column tie spacing for multi story building (read from bottom up)
2 ties equally spaced in beam
bottom of beam
1 tie at 4鈥?br>3 spaces at 8鈥?br>remained at 16鈥?br>3 spaces at 8鈥?br>1 tie at 4鈥?br>top of slab-on-grade
columns are 鈥減re-tied鈥?horizontally on a rack on the ground. the rodbuster starts the spacing at the bottom of the column and works his way to the top. the columns are later set with the crane.
here is my problem: once concrete is placed in the form and the form is subsequently removed i should only be able to observe two ties. the only two ties that i should be able to observe are the two ties that the rodbuster has tied on the dowels (for convenience) that are later to be equally spaced in the depth of the beam.
it is my contention that if i observe more than two ties that the required tie spacing is incorrect and steps must be taken to correct the discrepancy. the contractor has poured a number of ground level columns and i can observe three ties on a number of them. to me this means that the one tie required at 4鈥?below the bottom of the beam is missing and that the next tie down could be as much as 8鈥?below the bottom of the beam. any columns on which i can observe 3 ties have two spaces at 8鈥? are missing the 1 at 4鈥?and will have 3 in the beam.
the contractor claims (wrong headedly) that the spacing is determined by starting at the bottom of the column and working up and that a tie at 4鈥?below the bottom of the beam may or may not occur as the beam depths vary. what!? i understand that the beam depth will affect the total number of ties on a column but the spacing should not be affected unless a beam depth not divisible by 4鈥?was introduced.
it is my opinion that upon standing the column rebar that the layout engineer should shoot the bottom of beam elevation and determine if that one tie is going to be at 4鈥?below bottom of beam or not and if not that the ties be adjusted until the spacing is correct.
am i nit picking this guy as he vociferously claims or should i bring this to the attention of the engineer of record?
scet - techmaximus
check out our whitepaper library.
i vociferously claim you should bring this up to the eor. it is my guess, though, that the unequal spacing of the ties is due to a requirement of the eor to have a particular shear capacity in the column, based on some kind of shear distribution in the column (which i cannot fathom at the moment - but he is the eor).
with that, the 4" spacing is presumed to occur in the column, just below the beam. there are requirements in high seismic areas for particular amounts of ties within the beam/column intersection. but clarification from the eor is the proper thing to do here, and it would also allow both you and the contractor to defer to that source and not be at each other's throats.
although i鈥檓 sure he wanted to ring my neck over this and some other deficiencies i wrote up, we never really got at each others throats. the eor did straighten him out on this matter. my point all along was that if the tie required at 4鈥?below the bottom of the beam was too high it was often high enough to be in the bottom of the intersecting beam. the tie spacing doesn鈥檛 have to be perfect but the column ties should at least be in the columns and not in the beams. apparently very few inspectors look for these ties after a column is poured but i find it interesting to see if they are getting this correct.
techmaximus
the easiest thing to do is to observe the tied and formed column when it is in its upright position, but not poured yet. you can observe the ties, and if they are at proper spacing. you can see if they have the extra tie at the top and bottom, etc. the key here is to make sure the top of column is marked on the formwork so you can see where the tie spacing should start.
you can either make sure they leave off one side of the formwork on a couple columns, or climb a ladder and observe it.
in your case, yes it sounds like you should only see the 2 ties in the beam, and the tie 4" below the bottom of beam definitely needs to be 4" below bottom of beam.
what did the eor have the contractor do?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
concrete beam connection to steel column huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:40 AM
cantilever steel beam at column huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:40 PM
c.k.wang intermediate structural analysis huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:58 PM
another aci slender column question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:13 PM
4 ply - wood column 9i need help fast110 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:44 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:34 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多