几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 04:55 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 brick veneer as load bearing

brick veneer as load bearing
can an existing exterior brick veneer for a residential structure become a load bearing wall if a new addition is added to the structure? can a ledger be attached to the brick veneer? (the existing exterior wall becomes a interior wall and the wood stud walls all remain intact with ties)
no, attach to the stud partition with the new joist hanger 2x10 or whatever and leave the brick to carry its own weight and wind.
i do realize this is not good practice and really should not even be practiced. however we were called out to review this type of construction. for the loads (a small one room shed roof addition with ceiling joists) the evaluation as non-reinforced masonry per aci 530 indicates that it would work (h/r > 99). i guess i am trying to find a residential code violation or similar.
thanks
i doubt that there would be a specific code clause covering this.
so you have justified it for standing up under vertical loads, but what about under lateral loads. if the extension is not designed to be completely self supporting under wind then you are relying on some veneer ties to resist the majority of the racking loads.
csd
i have looked at shear lateral loads for the brick wall itself. as stated i do not think this is good practice and i do know some city/county ordinances prohibit this (more specifically for decks). however, i could not find any code references that do not allow this and was looking for input
thanks to all
brick veneer is just a very high quality siding material from a structural standpoint.
ledgers cannot be attached to veneer. they must be attached directly to the bearing wall.
everyone knows brick veneer provides substantial rigidity to a wood frame structure, but codes do not recognize the reliability because the construction methods and connections are not designed for the additional loads that it does resist. there is no structural tie between the wood frame and the brick that permits proper load distribution, plus the two materials are not compatible.
granted, the brick veneer itself may have greater more vertical load capacity than the wood frame wall, you have to look at the structure and its behavior considering that stiffer materials will take more load even if they are not planned to.
dick
i have used face brick for structural support on occasion.
if you are confident in your analysis, for vertical loads and lateral loads, then you can be comfortable with this design. as far as i know, there are no prohibitions against this.
daveatkins
zennie,
i was talking about loads perpendicular to the wall.
csd
i have spoken to the department of insurance in my state (they have jurisdiction over the codes) about this and even though it is not in the residential code (irc) it is understood by them, at the higher level, that you can not attach to it. i don't know what the inspectors are doing in smaller counties and towns...i see deck ledgers expansion anchored into the brick veneer only and the contractor says they have built thousands of these this way and never had a problem. i don't think the ibc has a specific section that states you can't resist load with it, except for its very definition...only allowed to support its own weight.
per my discussion with the city/county inspector he quoted the 2003 irc r703.7.3-lintels (in the wall covering section) stating, "...masonry veneer shall support any vertical load other than the dead load of the veneer above." why this falls under the lintels section in wall coverings and not elsewhere i do not know. and also he referenced chapter 14 of the ibc regarding how veneers are non-structural wall coverings and ornamental.
i do think there may be a limited or very limited circumstance that an existing veneer can essentially become a change in use (from an ornamental/non-structural to a structural non-reinforced masonry).
thank you all for input.
zennie,
should that statement be 'shall not' or are they okaying any vertical loads?
csd
also is it technically a veneer if it is no longer on the outside of the building?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
brick cladding deflection limits huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:48 PM
brick bearing pressure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:47 PM
bearing on old brick huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:15 PM
bearing on brick veneer a no-no huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:15 PM
bearing capacity of thru-bolts on brick huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:14 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:05 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多