几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 03:00 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 oo many requests for calculations

too many requests for calculations
good afternoon all,
i'm looking for advice/comments centering around what i feel are excessive requests by an owner for backup calculations.
i read through jae's
speaking of calculations i was talking to my boss yesterday about the need to continue with calculation programs (mathematica and basic) to support our current product design. he looked at me with puzzled expression and asked, doesn't autocad do that. it seems to me that things that were clear to most of us and understood years ago, are not necessarily understood today.
i was involved in a project where i was having difficulty getting my conveyor load drawings accepted by the general contractor. it was really simple statics but the reviewer had his own way of calcualting reactions. it took a meeting wtih me and other managers from my company along with the project owners, gc, design consultants, project managers, and other specialists to resolve this issue. while it turned out in my favor it took people at the highest level of the project to make it happen.
in your case it might be important how your scope of work is worded along with what this "usually" means.
regards,
-mikere
it seems you have one of those scope creep problems - the bane of our industry...
you may have to swallow it on this job, but i'll bet in the future you'll include contract language to combat this. if this was an extra in the contract and you were hitting him for 10 hours or more for each small change, he may have reconsidered. however, even if the client doesn't reconsider on future jobs, then you provide the service and get paid for it.
having been in the profession for about 35 years, we have seen our calcs for a particular project balloon from several pages to several volumes. alot of it has to do with the advent of computer programs, but some of it has to do with some unknown momentum that seems to require every little thing to be calculated.
this momentum may be a result of stricter oversite by inexperienced managers who do not know what actually is required. it also has to do with everyone's exposure to increased liability.
i don't know what the solution is other than contractural language that allows you to get paid for your additional effort.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】oo Many Oddbpoint During An Impor yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-07 05:10 PM
【转帖】oo Large Min Max Extents yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-07 05:09 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:26 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多