几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 02:46 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 imber load duration factor

timber load duration factor
i have a question regarding the timber load duration factor, cd. i have asked people and have received different answers. the way i interpreted the description in the nds code, is that the amount of time applied is the total time over the normal load distribution (10 years). it states that the normal load duration represents a load that fully stresses a member to its allowable design value by the application of the full design load for a cumulative duration of approximately 10 years.
my question is, how do you determine which factor to use, do you approximate how long the member will be loaded to its capacity over a 10 year life, or do you approximate how long the member will be continuously loaded?
for instance, code staes for a load duration of 7 days, use a factor of 1.25. can i load the member for 7 days off and on, and use this factor, or can i only load it for 7 days total over a 10 year span?

my understanding is that it is the total time that load is applied over the life of the
just to talk about it...... if you considered it as the time duration, your snow load time duration would exceed your live load time duration (which doesn't make sense) because you will certainly have snow on the roof (can be upwards of a month) for a longer period of time than you will have full live load (possibly a few days at most). this example is considering just the single duration, not cumulative total.
also, i believe cd accounts for creep. if you have a load on a beam for 7 days and remove it, the creep associated with that load doesn't just disappear, you must account for it.
you should apply a different duration factor for each load combination you have. dead plus live load will have a different factor than dead plus snow, and different for dead plus wind, dead only, and so on. the time associated with the duration factor represents the total amount of time that particular load will act on the member for the life of the
cd has nothing to do with creep. you account for creep in long term deflection calculations.
cd has to do with the fact wood can support larger stresses the shorter the period of time they are applied. this is unique to wood.
i recommend reading design of wood structures by breyer, fridley, cobeen. it is an excellent reference.
it is the time of continously loaded.
forgot to add, you apply loads via load combos. you apply the cd value to the combo based on the shortest duration within that combo.
therefore if you have combo d+l+s for a floor, and you say the live load is an occupancy live load, then cd=1.0. i wouldnt recommend reasoning a 10day interval on an occupancy live load that is applied on and off within a period of 10 years. i just dont see how you'd ever have that kind of certainty.
also note that localities sometimes reduce the wind/earthquake cd value to 1.33.
see 2001 nds 2.3.2 for the explanaiton of the duration factor. notice the term "cumulative duration", not continuous.
i agree with boiler.
thanks for the responses.
i'm ok with the load combintations but i'm still unsure with what factors to use with the specified loads. i have read 2.3.2 of nds, and about the description of "when the cumulative duration of the full maximum load does not exceed the specified time period, all tabulated design values shall be multiplied by the appropriate load factor cd from table 2.3.2 to take into accouint the change in strength of wood with changes in load duration."
however, how can you be sure of this time realistically if it is over the lifetime of the
buzzbromp-
you are correct, there will be snow on the structure for more than (2) months. however, the catch is how long the design load will be on the structure. it is certainly reasonable to assume that the maximum design snow load will only be on the structure for (2) months.
similar for wind - there is almost always some wind blowing on the structure, but you only count the time in which the design wind is blowing on it (you wouldn't consider it as a cd of 1.0).
thats what i mostly do.. just use 1.0 and even .9 if i support concrete on wood framing (.9 for dl).
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
partition live load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:35 AM
is ceiling part of the roof system load duration factor 9wo huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 09:27 PM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
bridge loading factor huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:12 PM
ad load factor in asd huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:22 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:59 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多