几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 11:57 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 strut and tie model and punching shear

strut and tie model and punching shear
i have to design a beam to support large point load (column over) which is about 0.5m from the support (column under).
if i use strut and tie model to design this area, am i still required to check for punching shear because the reaction is quite large. (i'm not too familiar with stm method).
thanks
check out our whitepaper library.
i would say that in this case you have to design and check mainly a corbel. there are provisions for designing corbels in the structural journal, and many texts like the one on rc by nawy also has. if there is more concrete than the corbel, you need design for the shear -and any forces- standing in whatever the kind it comes. but you can reinforce the whole thing (with care) as the superposition ot the corbel thing and the rest. if feasible, better to use a deeper thing than a corbel, but more likely is not feasible, from your exposition.
search in the mathsoft mathcad 2000 collaboratory, civil engineering folder
reinforced concrete corbel
i believe the reason for the development of the strut and tie model was to provide a load path which is more accurate than a deep beam model. to this end you have tension and compression forces but no shears.
thanks for both replies. my problem is not really a corbel situation. the beam is just support another column above which slightly offsets from the column below.
will i still have to check for punching shear with stm?
thanks
as stephened signals you need to ensure a load path to the ground for any loads. then, for example, and out of memory since the column has such small offset i think to re
do you have the new aci code? there is a quite extensive appendix having to do with the strut and tie models. no "punching shear" to worry about. it doesn't sound like you have a cantilever or corbel (right?).
there are some special aci provisions for a "regular" beam if the concentrated load is located less than a distance d from the support, but this will not apply in the s and t model.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
check of cantilever beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:26 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:29 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多