几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:03 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 snow load on open louvers

snow load on open louvers
i am analyzing a louver sunshade awning in a snow area with gsl of 40psf. louvers have 40% solid, 60% open projection. louver support is horizontal, louvers are slanted at 45 degrees to shade windows.
need an opinion as to whether drift load should be applied to this.
yes
ron,
i disagree with 3dboy for the following reasons:
1. because the louvers are inclined at 45 degrees i would not expect significant accumulation at such a steep angle.
2.i assume that they are made of metal which would conduct solar heat and melt the snow and prevent any significant accumulation.
3. louvers are aligned in a vertical plane. depending on the spacing of the louvers, any given louver would be protected from large accumulations by the one above it.
4. its overkill.
if you read asce 7 it has provisions for determining the factors you are concerned about (i.e. slip and whether it is heated or not) i think you should apply asce 7 and determine whether or not it needs to be accounted for. the code dictates that this is and "unheated" structure and the factor applied to the snow load as such is greater than 1. with a slope of 45 degrees the factor is less than one, but it still needs to be accounted for. if gsl is 40 psf, there is a significant amount of snow. i'm glad that there is a lot of openness, but snow drifts build up over openings. regardless of all the reasons you stated we have a duty to design per the code.
i agree that it should be designed per the code, if it applies. the snow loads in asce 7 are for roofs. louvers are obviously not roofs, but i would consider them to be components or cladding. the height of snow that would produce 40psf is most likely much greater than the vertical spacing of the louvers.
the openness in the code allows for assumptions and interpretations. we have a responsibility to follow the design codes, but we also are obligated not to follow them blindly.
motorcity/3dboy....thanks for the input. the argument between you was the same one i was having with myself! i've decided to compromise. i'm applying the drift load on the two louver lines closest to the building. the other two are hanging out in space and are not as likely to accumulate snow. further, the members are elliptical and canted at 45 degrees, further reducing the potential to collect.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
partition live load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:35 AM
load combination questionpoll huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:01 AM
lateral snow load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 09:49 AM
height of snow for 100 psf snow load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 04:05 PM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:32 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多