几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 11:52 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 smooth reinforcing - concrete design

smooth reinforcing - concrete design
does anybody have a good reference for the design of a reinforced concrete slab with smooth reinforcing? i'm trying to come up with a one way slab capacity for an existing slab. the testing agency has informed me that from visual observation in core holes, and the reinforcing samples that they've retrieved for testing, that the slab reinforcing is smooth. obviously, not what i was expecting. i'm not familiar with smooth reinforcing, and was wondering if anybody out there has any experience, references or even thoughts on vintage for this type of construction.
any help that you can offer is greatly appreciated.
regards,
steve rivard, pe
find a job or post a job opening
its also called plain reinforcing.
the strength depends on the date that it was built but could be as low as a36 steel.
bond lengths e.t.c. are much greater for this type of reinforcement.
if you look at aci 3.5.1, it does not allow the use of smooth reinforcement.
i'm not an expert, but i would suspect this requirement has been in place for a long time. is the testing agency just guessing, or have they recovered a sufficiently large piece of reinforcing to definitively state that it is not deformed?
the testing agency, as i indicated above, has samples of the reinforcing and has visually observed the reinforcing in the core hole locations. it's definitely smooth.
i also realize that plain reinforcing is not allowed, nor has it been since the aci 318-63 was in force.
this is an existing slab that i'm trying to determine a capacity for, and any references that anybody might have, is greatly appreciated.
regards,
steve rivard, pe
masonary structures by spalding, hyde & robinson 2ed. 1926
tests have shown steel embedded in concrete develops considerable bond strength and may be relied on to hold steel. if embeddment length is considerable, bond near load may slip, but deeper embedment will hold. ultimate bond strngth for ordinary concrete 200-700 psi of surface area.for structural work unit bond restiance 200-300 psi. twisted or deformed may give higher values.
also in the book they use concrete allowable stresses from 500 psi to 900 psi and steel allowable stresses from 14,000 to 20,000 psi.
hope that helps somehow
any chance it's a welded wire mesh where cross wires aid in the development?
spats,
the testing guys have indicated that it's 5/8" diameter individual bars at 4" o.c., so definitely not wwf.
regards,
steve rivard, pe
steve - today i scanned the reinforced concrete section of "trautwine's civil engineer's reference book" and posted it on my website. it is a good reference on how reinforced concrete was designed at that time. the information is from the early 1900's (mostly before 1910). it supports the numbers that drc1 has offered. the chapter does specifically talk about plain rebar; be sure to see the test result summary on pages 1331 and 1336. here is a the link
back in the '63 code (my personal favorite), there was a provision that smooth bars had 1/2 of the bond strength of deformed bars.
once a contractor demo'd a scale pit for me in a multi-story building (with smooth bars) and to my surprise all the trussed rebar was still hanging there and the concrete had just fallen off of the bars!
in the first quarter of the 20th century, a lot of square, twisted bar was used that was smooth.
is your section round or square?
mike mccann
mmc engineering
msquared48,
yeah, i've seen the square, twisted stuff before too. this stuff is round. it's just a bit different than i expected, based on prior experience.
regards,
steve rivard, pe
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
reinforced concrete building design step-by-step huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:12 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
concrete sampling guidlines huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:34 PM
concrete mix= reinfocing for exterior composit deck huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:19 PM
chapter 4 preliminary design properties of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:50 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多