几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 10:02 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 shear wall maximum rebar

shear wall maximum rebar
the design example and commentary i am using to design a concrete masonry shear wall/pier states, "tension steel, "as", shall be placed at the ends of the wall such that "as" does not exceed 6% of the area of the masonry cell into which it is placed."
though this seems reasonable, i cannot find support of this in aci 530-99. what is the maximum allowable rebar in a cell for shear walls?
any comments?

maybe the example is referencing a different standard such as ubc 2107.2.2.1, "maximum reinforcement area in cells shall be 6 percent of the cell area..."
if 6% is the maximum reinforcement area in cells, does this apply also where splices occur, or are splices exempt from this limitation? why or why not?
thank you!
12 percent at splices
ibc 2000, section 2107.2.4 modifies aci 530 to say "the bar diameter shall not exceed one-eighth of the nominal wall thickness". this means a #9 bar for 8" cmu and #10 for 12" cmu. section 2107.2.5 states that "reinforcing bars larger than #9 in size shall be spliced using mechanical connectors". my experience has shown the actual construction of reinforced masonry walls is difficult and is not precise. keeping the cells clean enough to grout properly and ensuring proper clearances around even small bars is not easy, especially at splices. therefore we try to use maximum bar sizes of #7.
an excellent point by rrmiv, and i would take it even a step further and try not to do anything more than a 20m (#6) bar, and reinforce more cells if possible. our experience is identical to rrmiv, in practice the mason's often don't prescribe exactly to the standards of construction, and getting a fully grouted core can be a challange. another problem we occasionally come across is keeping the reinforcment continuous through floor levels. seems the mason's don't like having the bars protruding from the top of the walls or something...anyway, keep an eye out if this is something you will have to deal with.
dutchie
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
in enercalc masonry wall design, what is parapet heigh huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:17 PM
foundation wall 40 feet below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:38 PM
development length of reinforcement in shear huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:30 PM
can i count on shear-friction capacity of the reinforcemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:22 PM
block shear vs. shear rupture at connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:57 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:40 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多