几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 09:58 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 shear transfer at column baseplates

shear transfer at column baseplates
hello all --
i have a braced frame building that i'm designing, and i have a question about the transfer of shear to the foundation. i know aisc discourages taking shear through the anchor bolts, since the baseplate has to displace before the anchor bolts become engaged. i've read in modern steel construction that friction can be used to take shear, but my office doesn't adhere to that philosophy. i have literature and design examples for shear lugs as an effective means, but to me they seem cumbersome to construct. i was thinking of welding plate washers to the top of the baseplate, then taking the shear through the anchor bolts since they become engaged immediately, and checking bending of the rods using the thickness of the baseplate and grout bed as the moment arm. what are your thoughts? also, is my office an anamoly for not considering frictional resistance? i guess i'm wondering about the design philosophies of others.
incidentally, i am a rookie, and i apologize if the question seems rudimentary. and this is also my first post in the forum, so if it belongs somewhere else, maybe just humor me a little.
thanks for your thoughts!
we never use friction.
one detail we've used includes a lug as you discuss. difficult to get built right.
another way is to set the baseplate down in a large sunken key and reinforce around the plate in the higher concrete. again...rather expensive.
there are several methods for accomplishing this, a few of which have been mentioned. the three discussed in the second edition of aisc's design guide 1 for baseplates and anchor rods (which i highly recommend as a reference) are:
1. shear lugs
2. bearing (by embeding the column as jae suggested).
3. anchor rods
you are correct in that aisc does not generally recommend taking shear through the anchor rods, but for small shears (80kips or so max) it is possible to weld plate washers to the baseplate and check combined tension and bending in the anchor rods, though you will end up with some fairly large, most likely gr105 rods. the method for doing this is clearly spelled out in design guide 1 (2nd ed).
the method i use, which is not provided in the dg, is to weld l5x5 angles to each side of the baseplate in the field after the base plate has been placed and then anchor them with post installed anchors into the foundation. this should be done after final column plumbing and prior to grouting.
the friction method only works if under all load conditions (where shear is present), there is always sufficient compression on the column to resist the shear.
we find that the shear lug is not the most friendly method and presents construction difficulties.
we use a cast-in template with headed studs (designed to take out the shear). this plate is at least 2" larger than the base plate on all sides. it also serves as the template to hold the anchor bolts in place.
once the column with base plate is set, 3/8" side plates get field welded to both the side of the base plate and the cast in template. the side plates are oriented parallel with the shear. they transfer the shear from the base plate to the cast-in plate in the pier.
this method seems to work well.
i agree with the responses. for small shear loads 50-60 kips use the anchor bolts. (re
i generally use a lug with a good pocket accommodate it... alternatively and for smaller loads, i use a plate washer with a 1/16" clearance hole welded to the base plate. so far... both work.
dik
alternatively, tie the column into the ground slab, taking the shear out that way.
this is standard practice in australia for industrial portal frames.
dont know if this violates any codes in the us though!
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
shear in slab desig need to be considered or no huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 09:41 PM
cantilever steel beam at column huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:40 PM
can i count on shear-friction capacity of the reinforcemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:22 PM
c.k.wang intermediate structural analysis huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:58 PM
block shear vs. shear rupture at connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:57 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:31 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多