几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 08:24 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 second-order analysis

second-order analysis
when is it really required?
i keep hearing a lot about people performing second-analysis on all their structures these days. we use ram advanse and performing a second-order isn't much of bear, but when i have done it, the difference has almost always been negligible. maybe, at most, it increase the moments in my columns by a percent or two. now, the firm i work for mainly works on low-rise buildings.
do second-order effects really become significant for larger buildings? can anyone shed some light on the trends here??
i don't perform second order analysis for reinforced concrete structures. dealing with low-rise steel structures, second order analysis does not vary significantly from a first order analysis.
there are all kinds of examples of situations in which the second-order moments are significantly more (say > 10%) than the first order ones.
taller buildings are examples.
low-rise building, a little on the tall side, with non-trivial gravity loads and a loose drift limit.
tall wind column that also has axial load.
i agree, though, that there are many, many counter-examples. i used to design lots of 5-10 story hospitals that had rigid frames for the lfrs and i seem to re
i think it also depends on what the lateral system is. if you have a shear wall or braced frame building, the second order effects will be minimal. if you have a moment frame building then second order effects will increase. something else that is often overlooked is the lateral load. if you have high gravity loads, you will see increased second order effects as your lateral load decreases. if you have a one story structure with light gravity loads (as one might expect for a roof - depending where you're located), and not unreasonably low lateral forces, then the second order effects will likely be minimal. second order effects are the p-delta effects - a small magnitude of p typically means a small amount of p-delta effects.
you should also break your columns along the length to capture p-little delta effects.
asce-7 has some guidance about when a 2nd order analysis must be performed. see section 12.8.7 of the 2005 version. when the ratio of secondary shears to applied shears (theta) is less than 0.10 then they say you can ignore the effect.
theta = p*delta / (v*h)
where:
p = total applied vertical load (at or above the story level)
delta = the elastic story drift between that floor level and the level below it.

v = the applied lateral force at that level.... not the sum of the shear forces from all the floors above that one.
h = story height.
aci 2002 (section 10.11.4.2) has a similar definition that they use to distinguish between a sway frame and a non-sway frame. with a sway frame requiring a more sophisticated p-delta or second order analysis. to some extent 2nd order effects are still required to be considered for non-sway frames.... but, only for very slender
quote:
if you have high gravity loads, you will see increased second order effects as your lateral load decreases
.
can you explain this? i may be missing a point. decrease in lateral load = decrease in δ = decrease in p-δ effects?
decrease in lateral load = decrease in delta is true. but if you have small lateral load, then your first order moments/drifts will be smaller. as a percentage of first order magnitudes, this is likely when you will see the largest second order effects. think about it on this extreme just to get the idea. say you have a single story structure (roof only) with very high gravity loads (say 300psf green roof) and no lateral load at all such that you only design for notional loads. first order moments/drifts will be small because of the very small lateral load, but the second order effects will be magnified because you have such a huge p. delta will typically always be around h/500, so the big driver is really p. as a %, however, the second order effects are most pronounce (typically) with high gravity loads and small lateral loads.
the key is "as a %".
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
second order analysis for a cantilevered column huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 08:24 PM
carrying out second order analysis with software huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:01 PM
cantilever vibration analysis huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:41 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:29 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多