几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 06:56 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 rigid diaphragm and bracing loads

rigid diaphragm and bracing loads
i have a 3 story building that uses the same steel brace size and configuration for it's lateral resistance(wind) from top to bottom, and has conc. floor diaphragms.
on the 3rd floor there is for example 3 braces (one on each end of the bldg. and one in the middle of the building).
on the 2nd floor, there is one at each end, one in the middle, and one that is added half way between the middle and one of the sides (say 30 feet from the middle brace).
at the first floor there are 2 at each end, one in the middle and one on each side of the middle (this time 20 feet away from the middle brace).
my question is will the diaphragm be able to distribute the accumulating force between all the braces equally on each floor or will the brace (for example the middle brace)which is lined up one on top of another, accumulate more force than the others as it would in a non rigid diaphragm?
find a job or post a job opening
it is not accurate to assume that the force that gets delivered to the brace at the upper level will stay in that brace and transfer to the brace immediately below. the traditional approach (hand-calc approach) of analysing multiple story rigid diaphragm structure considering each level as a one story structure, stacking them up and adding up the forces does not reflect the true structural behavior.
portion of the force at the base of the 3rd floor exterior brace for example will transfer thru the diaphragm and delivered to the intermediate brace line at the lower level. diaphragm must be checked for the uniform lateral load plus this additional shear.
so the brace at the bottom floor (in the middle) which has two floors of braces directly on top of it, with floor beams, can be safely designed as if it is going to equally share all the second and third floor loads with the other braces on the botttom floor? because of the diaphragm distribution?
i think whyun is right. when in doubt - always look at hooke's law: deflection and force are related to each other directly.
once you calculate your three forces in each brace between the third and second floor, these forces are applied at the locations of each of those three braces on the second floor diaphragm. the added lateral forces applied due to the mass of the second floor diaphragm creates a new "center of force" applied to the second floor. this totality of forces is resisted by the cummulation of the braces below, in accordance with their relative rigidities.
a floor diaphragm is pretty stiff compared to the braces - in fact, you can imagine the entire "stiff" floor deflecting laterally with minimal horizontal bowing...although there will be some. thus, all four braces below the second level will deflect the same.....
and hooke's law - equal brace and equal deflection = equal force.
now this doesn't take into account the possibility of center of mass not equalling the center of rigidity and the resulting torque on the diaphragm. that should always be included.
but i wouldn't simply direct all the upper brace forces into the lower braces that are directly aligned below. this ignores the fact that some of the force will be distributed across the diaphragm and the braces, in reality, are all working together, deflecting pretty much the same.
thank you, jae, for the additional comments. our methods of analysis (on anything) are based on certain assumptions and we try to attempt to portray reality as accurately as possible in the shortest amount of time possible (i am a consulting engineer and not a researcher).
often the assumptions include something being infinitely rigid or flexible, which often is not true. so regardless of which method is used to derive at the forces, they are merely our best "prediction" of the forces in the
consulting engineer:
work, think, fret, worry, struggle, race, hurry, frantic, etc.
researcher:
show up, continue process, cup-o-java, meetings, 8 hr. days, "what budget?", etc.
perhaps the above is like whyun's statement: either infinitely rigid or infinitely free.
right on, jae!
i second that jae...
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
flexible diaphragm why analyze as simple span huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:28 PM
flexible diaphragm and rotation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:28 PM
bottom chord bracing for cold form trusses huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:28 PM
beams braced with a welded flat steel plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:12 PM
3 sided metal diaphragm huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:37 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:34 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多