几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 06:47 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 return of shop drawingssubmittals

return of shop drawings/submittals
out of curiosity, for those that still red line shop drawings by hand, how many copies of the submittal do you typically send back to the architect or contractor?
in the 'old' days, it was fairly typical in my area of the country (nebraska, usa) for the structural engineer to recieve two copies of say structural steel shop drawings. one blue-line copy and one sepia (sp?) copy. only the sepia copy was returned to the architect, and either they or the contractor made copies of this for anyone who wanted or needed them.
this system evolved (around here) into the structural engineer receiving several copies of the drawings and the engineer was expected to copy his comments onto several copies to send back to the architect. thus turning the structural engineer (or his/her intern )into a medieval scribe copying comments onto each copy instead of using a copy machine to accomplish the same thing.
under this system, i typically would return no more than 3 copies of a sumbittal to the architect. one copy of the architect, one copy for the general contractor, and one copy for the fabricator or subcontractor doing this piece of the work.
in the last year i have recived requests on a few projects (demands really) to provide 5 or 6 copies of submittals back to the architect. the architects now claim that the owner(s) want copies, and the general contractor needs multiple copies, etc. (personally, i really don't believe this.)
on some submittals, it is only a matter of a few minutes to copy my comments over, and send things on their way. but on large buildings, the shop drawings can be very extensive, and if there are a lot of comments on them, making extra copies involves considerable time and expense on our part to provide.
i am curious as to what other structural engineers are doing in this area.
- do you copy your comments over by hand to mutliple copies? or do you only send one 'reproducible' set back to the architect?
- if you need to provide mutliple copies back to the architect, how many copies do you typically send? do you copy the commetns by hand, or send a copy to a print shop and make copies that way, at your expense?
we have added verbage in the spec's or proposals concerning shop drawings/submittals that deals with how they should be submitted. our preferred method is to return one red lined copy to the contractor and the contractor makes copies for anyone requiring a copy. second choice is we red line two copies; one is filed and one is used to make copies. the copies are charged to the contractor.
i have noticed the same trend. this should be addressed in your contract with your client. if they wish to pay you your standard hourly billing rate for hand-copying comments, then that's their choice.
personally i think, sometimes it is really difficult to read comments if they are in black. this is because black does not stand out in the black back ground of the shop drawings.
from this point of view, i can see the rationality behind the architect asking for more number of originals.
i suggest that you use a color copier to make additional copies from your original check print. this way your comments in red will stand out, which may satisfy the architect.
we are currently trying to come up with a way to deal with this. we typically receive 4-5 sets and are expected to send back 3-4 sets. this is very burdensome, especially when there are over 1200 pieces which have red marks all over them. we are talking to our clients (architects) to make sure we only need to send back 1 set, that way the intern only needs to transfer one set after we mark them up.
our office has seen both. our specs say to submit one set of reproducibles and one set of prints.... so one for us and one back to the architect. several people do not follow our spec and send 4 copies or so.
copying the notes is a pain. i try to find someone else to do it for me. i do see the point shin25 made. i'd prefer to read a comment in red. but i think a color copier is a better alternative and it should be the contractor's responsibility, and not the person i find to it for me. ha.
we're trying something new. we have the shop drawings scanned and send a cd with the pdf's on it as the return submittal. whomever wants a hard copy can print their own or just look at it on the screen. we keep the original, i think.
the cost of scanning a full size drawing in color is only about $3.00 if you don't need photo quality scans. much cheaper than any other type of reproduction.
we generally receive 5 or 6 copies and transfer our redlines to each set. i agree, it's aggravating and time consuming to do the transfers and back-check to make sure everything was transferred. but it's my experience, that's the best way to ensure the contractor sees the redlines. when copies of the redlines sheets were made, the contractors sometimes missed the mark ups that were in black on their copies.
during the last year or so, we've started using a local reproduction company to create color photocopies of the redlined sheets. the photocopies are the same size as the submittal sheets and are in red. works good so far, although we've had to pay for the copies. the copies are less expensive than the manpower needed to transfer the marks.
we used to require between 7 and 9 copies, depending on how many interested parties were involved. then we went to electronic submittal. (cue choir of angels.)
hg
currently, i have been involved in a big segmental bridge project. there are about 2000 pages of shop drawings for superstructure alone. it is still working out fine because all the drawing transfer happens electronically.
years ago, we received 6 copies and marked up each one. we wised up and changed our spec to require only two, one for doodling and one for the markups. we now scan it and send it back electronically. everyone sees the same marks.
we use a thick marker that shows up very clear on the scan. you cannot miss the redmarks!
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】how to add extended entity data yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 12:35 PM
【转帖】ado.net access操作方法 yang686526 ObjectARX(VB.NET/C#) 0 2009-04-19 09:37 PM
【转帖】曲线修剪问题 - 精华帖集合 yang686526 ObjectARX(C++) 0 2009-04-18 03:39 PM
Adoaccessor.dsw工程 yogy Database 3 2007-07-22 03:51 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:27 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多