几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 06:16 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 residential garage over wood framed floor

residential garage over wood framed floor
does anyone have experience with section 15.1 of the 2005 nds (lateral distribution of a concentrated load)? i'm trying to understand some of the limitations of a wood framed garage floor with a 3 to 4" topping slab over a wood system. the nds describes "at or near the quarter point" as being the worst case shear location. section 3.4 of the nds says this location is at d from the support. the garage in mind has two span joists running from a wall to a beam to the adjacent wall. how do i determine the shear load on my joists?
here's my initial take on it:
section 15.1.1 is solely for the purpose of determining the maximum moment in your garage beams. you take your wheel loads at the center of the span, placed directly over the beam. table 15.1.1 is used to determine how much of the load is taken by this loaded beam and how much is taken by adjacent beams which are not directly loaded.
so for example if your beams are spaced at 4 feet on center and you have a concrete slab, then the load on the critical beam is s/6.0 = 4/6 = .667. therefore, your center beam will support 0.667 of the total load and any adjacent beams that are 4 feet away would take the remainder (0.333 x total load).
this would then allow you to design for moment. you place a concentrated load of 0.667(l) at the center of the span and calculate the bending moment. then design the beam for moment.
now, to design for shear, you would enter the table 15.1.2 at the 0.667 mark on the left hand column. you would have to interpolate between 0.6 and 0.7.
the first two columns are essentially what you did above - you would have 0.667(l) for the center beam and 0.333(l) for the side beams. moving to the two columns on the far right, you would get something like 0.75(l)for the center beam and 0.25(l) for the side beams.
so for shear design of the adjacent beamsfff"> you would use 0.25(l) on the beam and place that load at the 1/4 point of the span to get an end shear.
the center beam shear design would be designed (in my view) for 100% of the load placed anywhere along the length.
what i think they mean by the 1/4 point being the approximate point of maximum shear is this: if you imagine a series of spaced beams (our 4 ft spacing example), then as you move a single concentrated load from the center of the span towards the end, the adjacent beam's shearfff"> will initially go up as the load moves closer to the ends.
however, as the load moves past the 1/4 point of the center beam span, the center beam gets pretty stiff (deflection is smaller near its ends) and the ability of the slab to distribute load to the adjacent beams is minimized by that stiffness.
thus as the load moves between the 1/4 point and the end of the center loaded beam, the shear in the adjacent beamsfff"> goes to zero and more and more of it remains in the center beam.
so the section 15.1.2 is onlyfff"> about the shear in the adjacent beams.
section 3.4 still applies for the shear in the center beam as the load moves closer and closer to the end of the span.
i think this whole section (15.1.2) would only be used if the load was pretty static and there were beams that were always "adjacent" to the loaded beam.
for a garage, the wheel load could potentially move all over the place so the design of individual beams would be really based on each beam being a "center", loaded beam.

for the shear load on the floor joists, place the wheel load as close to the end of the beam as the wheel can reasonably reach in the floor structure of the garage. this may or may not be all the way to the end of the span.
for the moment and deflection, place it at the center.
if you have bridging - 8' spacing max - i would put no more than 50% of the wheel load to one joist. if you have reinforcing in the concrete, this should help to span out the wheel load too.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
masonry wall with wood supports for roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 01:01 PM
connecting new residential garage floor to existing basemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:10 PM
allowable floor deflections versus workmanship standares huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:58 AM
5 concrete garage floor over wood frame huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:49 AM
2nd floor garage floor load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:35 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:22 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多