几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 03:37 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 pushover analysis

pushover analysis
i have done pushover analysis using software. i am wondering if there is a way to check that force (capacity) and displacements obtained from the pushover analysis are reasonable? it may not be exactly but it will get me within the ballpark.
thanks,
tim
check out our whitepaper library.
tim might be worth taking a look at the end of the faq there are a lot of questions that can help find errors.
i'm curious what you are doing that would merit a pushover analysis.
there are methods i know of for steel that allow you perform a pushover analysis using linear elastic software. for a particular load case, it requires making a new model each time a hinge forms, and summing up the results from each stage. there are some approximate corrective measures that need to applied to account for axial load (if it significant in your columns).
you have to assume a yield surface for your steel
there are a few programs running around that claim to be able to perform this type of analysis as a non-linear fashion. however i am yet to hear of this being used for any new structures only ever hear of it in combination with existing structures. never had to perform a pushover analysis myself, have a friend that is involved with r&d and all he ever said "you needed to treat it the same as normal design but backwards".
when in doubt, just take the next small step.

there was a time (before push-over software was available) where if you wanted to do this type of analysis, then you had to use linear software.
there is an appendix to one of the early fema documents that has an example where they have done this.... i used to have a copy of this. haven't looked at it in years. i'll see if i can dig it up and let you know the reference.
pushover analysis...oudated and inaccurate. if you want the real thing, perform non-linear time history analysis.
indepth = not a helpful response
i won't dispute that non-linear time history would be considered more accurate than a push-over. but, isn't the whole point of a push-over analysis that it is simpler and less time consuming to perform?
also, please elaborate on the "inaccurate" comment. we're engineers.... we only care about accuracy on a practical level. we've not all going to go out there and write a phd dissertation on every project solely for the sake of increased accuracy. i only need enough accuracy to demonstrate that the design / retrofit concept is sound or un-sound.
what are you guys considering the difference between pushover analysis and non-linear time-history analysis?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
p-delta and pushover huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:10 AM
non linear dynamic analysis pushover huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 04:32 PM
olerance analysis books huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 01:24 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:35 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多