几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 03:26 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 pull-out rating for concrete achor bolts

pull-out rating for concrete achor bolts
i am looking for the pull out rating on a 1/2" anchor bolt in a concrete slab. the anchor bolts are conventional j-bolts with 4" or greater embedment in 2000 psi concrete.
check aci and also the local bc, somtimes they overlap.
suggest you try
i never have seen concrete anchor bolts. we always use steel with standard coarse threads but i guess if you hang around long enough you'll see most anything. i recommend astm f1554 anchor rods.
2000 psi concrete is trash. if you can't get at least 4000 psi you need to fire your whole qc department.
4" embedment is not going to be much. i woulf neglect the effects of the hook and analyze this as a rebar embedment problem. re
aci 318-05 addresses this question in section d.5.3 for a j-bolt. the pullout strength of a single anchor is in section d.5.3.1 with the formula for a j-bolt in section d.5.3.5. you will see that the pullout strength for a j-bolt is much less than a headed bolt (d.5.3.4)
aci 318 1.1.1 states that structural concrete must have a specified strength of at least 2500 psi. i would not anchor to a 2000 psi slab.
thanks for the info (and the humor). the 2000 psi concrete comes from the literature of both simpson strong tie and usp connectors. i belive they are stating how well their post anchors work in minimal conditons (i.e. 4" of embedment in 2000 psi concrete). never mind all of that, i decided to go with usp high uplift post anchors. for an increase from $20 to $26 per post, the uplift rating increased from 470 lbs. to 2380 lbs. and the bearing more than doubled - not to mention that they are more user friendly to install.
the problem with the hook anchor bolt is that they are ubiquitous. substituting hardware store grade fully threaded rod is no solution because the material is low grade, and straight anchor bolts of various lengths, threaded 3 inches on each end do not appear in any supply houses that i contacted in new york state.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
pull-in winch support frame huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 03:26 PM
load rating reinforced concrete pipes huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:10 AM
load rating of existing bridges huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:09 AM
concrete floor fire resistance rating huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:07 PM
arema rating steel bridge load combinations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:50 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:11 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多