几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 02:41 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 prestressed concrete pile to cap connection

prestressed concrete pile to cap connection
i'm trying to accurately model a pier in which two 18" prestressed concrete piles (one battered) will be tied together using a simple pile cap. since there will be significant lateral loading and need for moment transfer, i'm trying to find typical detailing for a simple moment connection. the following are details that i've seen and/or used in the past:
1) simply embed the pile 12" into the cap.
2) embed the pile ~3-6" into the cap and expose the strands an additional 9-12".
3) cutoff the pile 6" into the cap and dowel moment transfer reinforcement into the pile.
i read in the florida dot manual that 12" embedment into the cap would be considered a pinned connection and 48" would be considered fixed. 48" seems high to me so i was hoping there would be an alternative/optimized solution.
anybody's thoughts/experience would be appreciated.
thanks.
#2 and #3 are most widely used.
but these would both of these be considered fixed? strands usually need quite a long development length so i'm hesitant to assume that this is 100% effective.
i have done this by embedding conventional reinforcing bar into the top of the piles. the grout may take the form of a high strenght epoxy resin which will not need a large anchorage depth- manufacturers details should be consulted.
i did my thesis on something similar, it was steel piles into a cip pile cap. what i noticed along with research is that if you have embed the piles 2 diameters into the cap it will act the same as if you had steel connecting the two with rienforcing. of course you must think about the size of the cap as well. my recommendation would be to embed the piles a development length above the centroid of the cap and forget the reinforcing. if you treat the lateral force as a point load that acts at the centroid of the cap then you must embed the piles above this centroid such that shear cracking can't fully develop. the spacing of the piles is also a consideration. look up the name mowka, he's done a lot of research on this topic. of course things change when the material changes too, i never tested precast.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
precast pile connection to pile cap huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 02:22 PM
precast concerete pile cap and embedded plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 02:13 PM
pile to pile cap connection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 12:29 PM
h pile to pile cap connection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:38 PM
chapter 4 preliminary design properties of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:19 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多