几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 02:41 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 prestressed beam analysis

prestressed beam analysis
i'm currently analyzing a prestressed concrete beam for the purpose of issuing repair recommendations. the as-built drawings date back about twenty-five years, and i question the logic in part of the design.
the beam in question is simply-supported with sixteen 1/2" prestressing strands on the bottom and four 1/2" strands on the top in the compression region. all strands are tensioned to 28.5 kips.
the question i have is why would somebody place prestressing strands (instead of conventional rebar) in the compression region of a simply-supported beam? my background does not include a great deal of prestressed experience, but doesn't this counteract the benefits of prestressing the bottom strands to a certain degree?
it does counteract the bottom prestress a bit (moves the center of gravity of force upwards.) however, from a stress point of view, there is a force/area component and adding top strand will give the overall section more compression.
it could be that the top strands were there to control tension cracks from the bottom strands (during strand detensioning), near the ends of the beam (where there is very little beam self weight moment to put the top of the beam into compression.)
if the lift points of the beam were in from the ends (say at beam length/5), then you would have tensile stresses from the beam self weight at the top of the section where you are lifting. the bottom strands would further add to these tensile stresses, so some top strand would have counteracted these tension stresses at the top of the beam.
be careful with the type of strand (older strands were usually stress-relieved, which resulted in more losses - now they are always low relaxation to minimize this effect)
a couple of helpful websites fyi
wpgkarl has said it right.
be careful about the type of strand and ultimate strength to calculate the loss of stress and strength.
you are better of finding code books, aci or aashto that date back to that time.
wpgkarl is pretty much on the mark. we have had had precasters add prestressing strands to the center of precast columns (adding compression to a compression
thanks to everyone for their input. luckily enough, the partial set of drawings i have do in fact indicate the s.r. strands were used.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
help with composite beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 04:15 PM
cross beam bolted connection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 03:55 PM
cantilever steel beam at column huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:40 PM
beam strengthening huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:04 PM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:30 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多