几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 12:03 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 pencil paper vs. software for calcs

pencil & paper vs. software for calcs
i'm wondering, how many structural engineers mainly rely on software like mathcad for their calcs, versus how many mainly rely on a calculator with pencil and paper?
i use software for preliminary sizing and verifying final design. i use pencil and paper for design, regardless of project size.
bjb,
an interesting question. i brought up a similar topic in
overall, we use software for about 75% of the calcs. personally, i use software probably at least 95% of the time, especially excel. ( i am an "old" guy but am kind of burned out by punching calculator and writing numbers all day). we don't use mathcad at all.
most of my calc's are still by hand. we do alot of alterations to existing structures and additions, and run into stuff that can be unusual. i have some spreadsheets that i made for things like shearwall analysis for rigid and flexible diaphragms, and i also have some things programmed into my hp, like alowable stress for wood columns and unbraced wood beams. i have checked out enercalc, but so far the powers that be are not into it.
i had considered buying mathcad several times over the years, but each time i got interested it had drastically increased in price (currently it is $1200). finally i bought calculationcenter because it was relatively inexpensive at $295. it to has gone up in price however, currently at $595. i like it but it's not pretty. mathcad seems to be the standard for engineering.
-mike
i am still patiently waiting for the day when i can have all computer generated calcs on a project (i will probably be retired before that day comes). we have over 100+ spreadsheets that we use for specific tasks in addition to ram, visual analysis, enercalc, etc. no mathcad.
jike, how do you like enercalc?
unlike large steel or concrete buildings, wood-framed buildings are very tedious to calculate without software, and enercalc doesn't really provide a total system approach. (woodworks is somwhat better in that regard). therefore we have developed an excel workbook that greatly automates the procedure for wood-framed buildings, especially multi-family residential.
i use both pencil & paper and enercalc for component design. primarily, i use enercalc for steel and concrete
i use paper and pencil for most situations. sometimes compose excel spreadsheets to do repetitive operations. use basic software for steel or wood beam continuous span calcs for shear, moment, & deflection. however, i no longer do very many design projects, and they are normally one-of-a-kind.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
discussion - should software producers be registered huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:56 PM
design software help huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:59 PM
【转帖】windows 64-bit Platform yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-07 07:17 PM
【转帖】paper background position yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 09:37 PM
【转帖】layout paper size yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 04:41 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:16 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多