几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 11:16 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 paint in lieu of galvanizing

paint in lieu of galvanizing
folks,
i am not a structural guy, but i have a structural problem of sorts. at an ongoing project, i received a call first thing this morning from the gc that "the steel arrived, but it isn't galvanized." by steel, he means about 250 feet of w21x73 to be used as a pipe bridge across a creek. the steel arrived with the red (zinc?) primer only. the specifications and drawings (prepared by others) clearly show the steel to be galvanized, but evidently the steel contractor "missed that part".
i'd love to tell him to send it back and get it right, but that won't fly with a two week turnaround time, so i need some alternative coatings that can be field applied. the steel will be exposed to the elements (not marine).
any ideas?
thanks.

if you are going to paint it, i would use tnemic paint. it bonds to the steel much better than regular paint. do you have any dissimilar metal issues, where you need a break between them, to consider?
what is your long term time frame? this bridge is supposed to stay in place for how long without requiring maintenance?
there are zinc rich steel coatings that are available.
i am unsure of their performance in the long term or compared to hot dip galvanizing.
get the steel galvanized.
the only metal to metal interface will be with the anchor bolts, but this is steel to steel, so i don't think that will matter. the long-term time frame could be as short as three years or as long as 30, but the current thinking is closer to the three year mark. i would anticipate zero maintenance will be conducted on this once it is built.
epoxy enamel paint will last 20 years with no traffic if correctly applied.
if it has been spec'd as galvanized, then almost any coating will be inferior and the long term corrosion of the material will be greater.
they should supply the correct specified material. alternative coatings, approved by the eor, can be considered, but these are high end coating systems.
dik
require the contractor to either hot dip galvanize the material or provide a interest bearing note that will fund recoating after 10 years. i suspect that he'll figure out a way to get the galvanizing done.
even though your schedule is tight, you're going to have to live with the structure for a long time. don't let him (or her) use the schedule as a club to make a bad decision.
a paint system including a zinc rich primer can give good performance but is dependant on (i) good surface treatment and (ii) good painting conditions and procedure.
(i) probably means removing the existing primer by blasting
(ii) may be difficult to achieve in the field.
galvanising may well be just as easy to obtain as a good paint system, and is the more robust solution.
if you get people who know what they're doing (say, bridge painters), you should be able to get a zinc-rich coating applied well. in theory. with good inspection and a good specification. and yes, you do need to remove the existing primer, or the zinc in the coating won't accomplish anything. you need close to a white-metal blast. and you want something that will provide a dried film with at least 94% zinc dust by weight. look for coatings recommended for bridges.
if you want something resembling galvanizing, try metallizing. again, you'll still need to blast off the shop primer, but spray metallizing is comparable to galvanizing in its ability to protect from corrosion over the long term.
hg
i would also say metallizing in the field is the way to go. metallizing may not be as good as hot-dip galvanizing, but it’s better than painting (even with a zinc rich paint). this is a somewhat common coating used for highway and railroad bridge girders which are too large to be hot-dipped.
the cost will be higher than painting, so expect resistance from the contractor if you choose to go that way.
in my mind, it is not your call to make on weather to accept a painted system. it is the owner's. they have to live with the system for many, many years, and will be responsible for maintaining the coating.
if the structure is above a creek, it will be a little difficult to maintain a paint coating. and so, more than likely, it won't get done.
painting is inferior to hot-dipped galvanizing. that is why you spec'd it in the first place.
ask the owner if he is willing to accept painting, and if so, how much of a credit he want back for accepting an inferior product than the one specified in the contract documments.
if the owner does decide to accept a painted system, you will need to strip the primer paint off. painting over the primer is a very bad system that likely will not hold up very long.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
paint as good as hot dip galvanize huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:15 AM
galvanizing repair huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 02:19 PM
is it ok to paint an aircraft antenna huangyhg 精密机械 0 2009-09-05 11:02 PM
specifying paint on us commercial drawings huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 12:59 PM
【转帖】specifying paint on us commercial drawings yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 10:03 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:14 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多