几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 03:45 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ncees structural exam

ncees structural exam
with the advent of the new all-governing intenational code 2000, the following questions have come up:
1. has anyone heard if california has any intentions of merging their seoc structural exam with the ncees national structual exam?
2. will california ever allow ncees structural engineers to get reciprocity in their state?
3. other than a strong seismic influence, what are the other differences between the california test and the ncees structural exam?
the international code will not override california's requirement for structural engineers. the code is a minimum outline and does not deal with structural details, such as beam connection.
1) no, and for those of us outside ca, why would we want this? living in a seismically inactive area, i really don't want to have to study it.
2) no, and unless the ncees includes high seismic activity problems, ca probably won't ever.
3) californians have bunches of other rules. it is a very regulated state. (sorry for the ambiguity but my experience when working with companies in ca.)
wait until the new madrid fault slips then you'll all be scrambling to learn seismic design.
i live in new jersey, but i got a calif. civil eng. pe about 5 years ago by taking their special seismic and surveying tests (2 1/2 hrs. each). they gave me reciprocity for the national pe civil exam that i took several years earlier. 99% of the seismic questions are taken directly from the ubc, and it's open-book. so i don't understand why so many people flunk it.
don't quote me on the following, but i think it's still true: to get a calif. structural pe, you need references from 5 calif. stuctural pe's. so if you're not working in ca, you may as well forget it. also, you only need a structural pe to stamp designs of schools, hospitals and high-rise buildings.
a civil pe was ok for designing the low-rise pharmaceutical plants i was doing at the time
there has been an update on the position taken by seaoc who is not urging support of all sea chapters through ncsea to change from a title act (structural engineering license) to a practice act (se-i and se-ii license) as well as support of the ncees standardized examinations.
three documents of interest on this subject have been posted on the structuralist.net website at:
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
limits of practice for civil vs structural engineers huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:39 AM
how to handle see structural drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:48 PM
dimensions on structural drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:51 PM
ca pe which exams needed if already pe huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 06:00 PM
advantage of se exam over the pe exam w structural depth huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:19 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:30 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多