几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 03:12 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 more - minimum concrete cover tolerance

more - minimum concrete cover tolerance
am inspecting on a job where the elevated slabs are 3' thick with #6@6 bot. short-way, #6@12 bot. long-way, #6@12 top long-way and #8@6 top short-way.
top mat cover reqd. = 3/4"
with the tolerance in reduction in cover can be 1/2".
in the completed slabs, lots surface cracks in the short-way direction, spaced curiously at multiples of 6".
is the full 3/4" of concrete cover enough to provide sufficient aggregate interlock over that big of a bar to prevent these cracks? or am i just barking up the wrong tree altogether?
check out our whitepaper library.
did you take a look at the concrete mix design? often when there is not a lot of cover, a mix with smaller aggregate will be used. this is the first place i would look.
dwha is correct about looking at the mix design. for a 3/4" cover on the slab, the maximum size of the aggregate would be about 3/16"....that's pretty small for concrete aggregate. you could also interpret the code to mean the aggregate in this application should be no more than 1/2". in either case, you have to look at the mix design to check the nominal coarse aggregate size.
if the mix design was for no. 57 stone, with 3/4" cover, that could cause aggregate segregation and the cracking you noted.
i think what you are seeing is plastic settlement cracking. in a thick slab, revibration is required if these cracks over the bars are to be prevented. this type cracking can occur even with much larger cover if the consolidation is inadequate. often seen in the top of footings which have top bars.
settlement cracking is likely the correct explanation, but 3/4" cover is not enough for a 36" thick slab. it should be at least 1.25" in my opinion.
ba
it's a #7 stone mix and the cover was increased to 2".
possible formwork issue?
i doubt that it is formwork related. if the cracks follow the #8 top bars, it is almost certainly plastic settlement cracking due to inadequate consolidation. another possibility would be restraint shrinkage cracks, but as you said there are lots of cracks, that doesn't sound like planar shrinkage. no cracks on the bottom surface?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
minimum concrete cover tolerance huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 02:09 PM
concrete sampling guidlines huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:34 PM
concrete mix= reinfocing for exterior composit deck huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:19 PM
chapter 4 preliminary design properties of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:12 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多