几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 01:27 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 mean roof heigh

mean roof height
dear all,
i am having one question on the mean roof height calculation. i am using asce7-98.
in one of my project, the eave height (roof slab) is 58' 6". there are some curtain walls are starting from roof to the height of 8'. moreover there are few pockets going upto 10'-14' at elevator/stair areas. now my q is either to use fig 6-3 or fig 6-4.
please explain.
-murali
murali27,
the mean roof height of your structure is 58'-6". the walls extending above that height may be treated as parrapet walls and not roof structure. for figure 6-4 you would get the external pressure coefficient gcpf for low-rise buildings (<60 ft). for figure 6-3 you would get the external pressure coefficient cp for all heights. if the roof slope is <10 degrees the mean roof height is measured at the eave, which means you may use either figure 6-3 or 6-4.
hope this helps, if you need more info please elaborate.
hi erv,
thanks for your reply.
this is a shearwalled concrete bldg. roof slab is a flat surface & few pockets are going up by 10'-14'.
enclosed bldg. size: 230' x 95'
can i assume roof angle as 0 deg or the avg of roof slab height & top elevation of pockets ? pl explain.
external pressure coefficients are (if roof angle = 0 deg)
fig 6-3 -> windward wall = 0.8
leeward wall = -0.3
fig 6-4 -> wind ward wall = 0.4
leeward wall = -0.29

obviously the forces are less if we follow fig 6-4 when compared to fig 6-4. pl explain what to do in this case ?
-murali
the mwfrs is from the eave height down. if the roof is flat or nearly so treat it as a flat roof. by all means use figure 6-4 for your calcs (of course the forces are less in 6-4, this is for buildings <60 ft).
the projection above the roof (10 - 14 ft) should be treated as a parapet (or separate structure), with separate wind analysis (for structures over 60 ft tall).
thanks erv.
in this project i got 1.5 times more wind load in fig 6-3.
since the force is too high with the matter of 2' height difference.
this probability theory of computation does not give any smooth transition with respect to limiting values.
thanks once again.
-murali
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
low slope roof construction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:50 AM
gypsum roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:37 PM
flat roof repairs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:23 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM
a flat roof huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:05 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:31 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多