几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 10:16 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 lifting beam made of plate

lifting beam made of plate
i have been tasked with assinging a rating to a lifting beam to be made of 1-1/4" plate a572 gr 50. there will be two choker attach points on top 12ft apart. the lift points will be a pattern of hole 12inches apart with the outer most holes 24 ft apart. the overall length and height will be approx 25 ft x 8ft. following asme bth-1-2005 it looks like the rating will only be around 18 tons. the customer was hoping for something more like 100 tons (with nothing more than having seen something similar in the past as a reference). am i missing something? thanks
hi jflusche
i am not familiar with asme bth-1-2005 however i would stress the plate as a been i presume you have done that.
what size are the lifting eyes won't the safe working load be limited by those.
desertfox
your drawing seems to indicate service level inclined shearing forces of 50 tons/sin(60 deg)=57.73 tons to be taken at 60 deg inclination, plus safety (and dynamic between holes needs be (between other things be checked), and interaction of stresses. some assumption of initial deformed shape can be needed there, and anywhere the plate becomes compressed for some length and not properly restrained. given your drawing, it seems it will likely be controlled by the details of upper support.
retry better written i hope...
your drawing seems to indicate service level inclined shearing forces of 50 tons/sin(60 deg)=57.73 tons to be taken at 60 deg inclination, plus safety and dynamic impact factors. compression between holes needs be checked (between other things), and interaction of stresses. some assumption of initial deformed shape can be needed there, and anywhere the plate becomes compressed for some length and not properly restrained. given your drawing, it seems it will likely be controlled by the details of upper support.
the maximum bending stress in the plate is about 3125 psi which is fairly low, but as ishvaaag has pointed out, lateral buckling is likely going to govern.
could you add a channel at the top and bottom edge to resist buckling? then the depth and thickness of plate could be reduced as well. the net result would be a lighter and stronger lifting beam.
ba
it can have also big forces for loads on a single hole at bottom so checking the maximum at any of these and the interesting combinations is also mandatory.
the most efficient structural shape to resist shearing and bending stresses is going to be a combination of vertical plates (the one you have) and horizontal plates welded to the top and bottoms of the vertical plate. this you should have learned in mechanics of materials. i have never seen a lifting beam without flanges.
other aspects not so apparent from mechanics of materials is flange buckling and web buckling. the former will occur on the compression flange and will limit the load capacity of your lifting beam. web buckling will also limit your capacity and can be dealt with easily by adding stiffeners to your beam's web.
assuming you have the holes where you need rigging to bolt to (shackles, etc) then you should really have stiffeners right above the lifting points. however, this may be impractical with so many different lifting arrangements. so you may need to increase the web thickness.

regards,
qshake
eng-tips forums:real solutions for real problems really quick.

do you need a factor of safety to satisfy osha?
i appreciate all the help. i did not show that we will use "washers" around the lifting holes. i am confortable with the design of the lifting points. i am most concerned with the unsupported length and the plate buckling with a load at the outermost points. thanks for comments.
for what it is worth, the 13th ed. aisc code has a very nice section on the strong axis bending of plates. you may find it helpful with your question about plate buckling. page 16.1-60, i believe. attached is a link to the spec.
jwb
something else i don't believe anyone has mentioned so far, normal beam theory does not apply to deep beams. i believe the dimensions of this plate qualify it as a deep beam.
ba
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
determine load rating of a lifting beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:23 PM
bearing plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:17 PM
beam theory vs. plate theory huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:06 PM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM
10 ft continuous weld beam to cover plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:26 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:06 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多