几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 04:02 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 heavy live load reduction

heavy live load reduction
the icc (2000, 2003) states that if you have a minimum live load of over 100 lbs/sf you can not reduce it, except only for columns (then it is a reduction of 20%). a study guide interprets this to only apply to storage facilities. in an example, they present a library building with a live load of 125 lbs/sf. the example shows that the live load is reduced as appropriate for smaller loads for each of the 5 floors.
when i read the code (1607.9.1.1 or 1607.9.2) there is no mention of storage differentiation. it seems to apply to all live loadings over 100 lbs/sf.
does anyone have any clarification on this? am i missing something?
find a job or post a job opening
looks to me you have the choice of 2 possible ll reductions.
1607.9.2 is an alternate floor live load reduction.
1607.9.1 is the primary method of determining the ll reduction. if you can satisfy 1607.9.1.1 you can take that reduction.
your study guide, i would say, is in error.
is it appropriate to design for 1607.9.1 for all cases? is 1607.9.2 used as a less conservative backup?
the study guide seems to rely heavily on the latter - does not check the 1607.9.1 spec. i believe the 1607.9.2 is from the ubc. if so, the author is likely providing examples from past experience with the ubc.
ibc 1607.9.2 is the same as section 1607.5 of the 1997 ubc. looks like this was the main method of ll reduction in ubc. it may be that ibc adopted it as an alternative ll reduction method to satisfy the ubc contingent when sbc, boca & ubc were originally rolled up in the 1st release of ibc.
looks to me like ibc 1607.9.1 is applicable for all cases except those listed in 1607.9.1.2, 9.1.3 & 9.1.4.
the primary method of ll reduction in ibc looks very similar to the alternate ll reduction in ubc section 1607.6
sbc-99 section 1604.2 covers ll reduction. it is almost exactly the same as the alternate ll reduction method in section 1607.9.2 of ibc.
boca-99 section 1606.7 covers ll reduction. it is very similar to the primary method of ll reduction in 1607.9.1 of ibc.
after taking a look at all the codes my impression is that the ibc primary method of ll reduction in 1607.9.1 comes from the boca ll reduction method and the ubc alternate ll reduction method. the ibc alternate method of ll reduction in 1607.9.2 comes from the ubc and sbc primary ll reduction methods.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
floor live load reduction ubc 97 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:47 PM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
asce7-05 live load reduction with load combos huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:28 PM
50 live load reduction factor huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:52 AM
100 or 100 = 25 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:27 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:31 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多