几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 02:37 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 glass block masonry lateral suppor

glass block masonry lateral support
2006 ibc section 2110.4.3, requires lateral support of 200 plf. how do you interpret that, does my support have to be able to resist 200 plf along the 4 sides of the panel? or is it 200 plf times the horizontal direction of the block applied as a point load into the jamb or possibly as 200 plf over the height of the panel into the jamb?
thanks
akastud
check out our whitepaper library.
the paragraph reads that "lateral support" (which is either anchors at 16" o.c. or channel-type restraints) must be designed to resist...200 plf.
earlier it states that the lateral support must be along the top and sides.
so i would say the strength of the top and side lateral restraints (be they anchors or channels) must resist 200 plf along their length.

jae, i absolutely agree with that, and have no problem with that, but i have masonry walls beyond the channels. how far out do i have to carry that load. do you think after i anchor the channels, i am done with that larger load, or do you think i have to design my jambs and lintels for that load as well. i think the word "support" takes me to the masonry design as well, but it seems like an excessively large load to resist by the jambs.
akastud
i'm not sure what you mean by "masonry walls beyond the channels".
i think the intent of the code is that you have this finite glass block wall with definitive ends and a top. then you have some form of channel that cradles the edges and top to prevent out-of-plane movement.
with the 200 plf load on the channels, the channels themselve must be anchored to something to support the wall. that something must be anchored to the main structure to take the loads on out - full load path.

i apologize, i confused you a little, and now i know why. the glass block sits in a channel that is anchored to a masonry wall. the glass block (10' x 10') sits on either side of a 6' wide masonry jamb. the confusion comes in what loads to be placed on the jamb which spans between floor and roof diaphragms. i hope you are still with me...
so in designing the jamb. at the bottom and top of the glass block, i have 10'(200 plf) 2000# and then i have 400 plf along the jamb between the 2 point loads. so for these two glass block windows which in theory add 1125 total pounds of seismic load to my jamb (based on weight and seismic acceleration) instead i have to design my jamb for 8000 total pounds of force. this doesn't seem right to me.
thanks,
akastud
it doesn't seem right to me either, but that is how it reads, i guess.
keep in mind that the 200 plf only applies at the top and sides...not at the bottom of the glass block panel. that will help a little, but not much.

i guess my question is how far to transfer the load. you mentioned full load path, and i would typically not argue with that point, however with seismic loads you often design elements with higher force capacity than the system as a whole can take. diaphragms, collectors, steel attachment elements etc. so to what point do you think i have to go. there are not many masonry walls that will take 6000 # (reduced to account for the bottom) out of plane load in addition to the self induced seismic forces.
akastud
i believe that you could argue it the other way also. the code is probably intending to treat the glass unit support the same way that you would treat a component with a small tributary area by putting the minimum 200 plf to account for very localized loading. i think you could justify applying that load to the channel and it's connection and then design the lintel and jamb based on its component wall loads as you would for any other type of opening.
whir,
that is my argument, but i don't know if it is correct and i am asking for opinions on that thought. thank you.
akastud
i would end the design at the connection of the glass block to the support only. masonry portion would be designed for the out-of-plane seismic load from its own weight plus the tributary area of the glass blocks. i agree with the gist of what whir said.
interpretations will vary and ultimately you need to go through the interpretation of your local building official.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】set Block Attribute Values yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-07 03:36 PM
【转帖】memory leak issue yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 05:37 PM
【转帖】grouping in svg based on block hierarchy yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 11:41 AM
【转帖】cloning a block yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-04 05:50 PM
【转帖】a dimension error yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-04 03:05 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:04 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多