几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 10:37 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 epoxy anchors vs. standard hook anchor

epoxy anchors vs. standard hook anchor
i've been asked by the contractor if he can use epoxy anchors vs. the standard anchor on a project. is there any reason why this cannot be done. obviously i've checked all loads and everything works fine. thanks
i can't think of a reason why. are you in a seismic region? this may have an impact on it.
allowable loads on chemical anchors have to be reduced if the manufacture's specified "edge distance" is not met. perimeter anchor bolts may have a problem with this requirement - be sure to consider this factor in your calcs.
last monday i had a seminar in my office by hilti corporation(toronto, canada). this was basically an effort to restore deisgn engineers trust on adhesive anchors in light of big dig boston ceiling collapse.
by the way there are so many if and buts like temp range, cleaning of hole, air voids in epoxy pumped in etc. in usa it is mandatory to have inspection for these anchors. i would rather always favour traditional hooks embeded while pouring concrete.
i spoke with a hilti rep at the last ncsea conferenceand she said they were working on a program to "certify" individuals to install epoxy anchors.
this certification would be with the individual, not the company, and the intallation would ned to be performed by the individual (not someone else with the certified person on site or even supervising).
this seems like a nice step forward.
as mentioned above, a lot of things can go wrong with installation (namely improper - or no- cleaning of the hole).
you probaly figured this but since other people use this forum for answers to their own questions and this is fairly common, it should be said:
you lose inherent quality control items by adding the possibility of inadequate bond due to improper hole cleaning and inadequate bond due to air voids between the rod and the concrete. with standard hooks, seeing is believing. this is addressed by many engineers by requiring pull tests on the epoxyied rod, however.
thanks for all your help.
i'm located in mn so there isn't a need to design for seismic. i don't have any lateral or uplift loads associated with my anchors.
i've also made sure all of my edge distances and spacing are in check with the manufacturers recomendations.
thanks again
i had a contractor install epoxy grouted anchors in concrete tie beams in lieu of the specified cast-in-place. in many places the drill either cut the rebar or the bit was deflected by it and the anchors ended up installed at a skew.
i won't allow them where there is rebar congestion.
it's easy to to use post-installed anchors in place of cast-in-situ anchors under some circumstances.
re. dynamic loading; most adhesive anchors do not have approval to use under dynamic loading conditions. as i re
"is there any reason why this cannot be done."
yes, there are two reasons why this can not be done.

1) contractors notoriously can not get this right. at two different jobs within just this past week i was able to pull out, with one bare hand, allegedly epoxied in dowels.
a) i found holes drilled 2" deep for # 6 bars
b) i found holes drilled 2" deep for # 5 bars
c) i found holes not brushed out prior to placement of epoxy. blowing the hole out with that big construction air compressor that blows a quart of oil per day will not work. the holes have to be brushed out and blown out with clean (oil/water free) air.
d) i found cases where the mixing tube was not placed on epoxy gun so that in the hole the epoxy was black on one side white on other side.
e) i found places where #4 bars were hammered into 1/2" dia. holes and the epoxy was squeezed out on the pile of dust that was still around the top of the hole!
all that just in one week!
2) the placement of rebar by drilling/epoxy according to chpt 17 is a required continuous inspection. the owner/client will need to be informed that his testing/inspection budget is going to take a huge hit as the special inspector will be spending a lot of time monitoring the correct placement/installation of these dowels.
if you allow this you may want to consider having a pre-con meeting to review the process of installation and inspection with the inspector and the contractor.
we use epoxy adhesive more or less on a regular basis. they tend to provide expected results if all manufacturer's recommended steps are followed. infact, very recently, we installed few adhesive anchors and had them tested for pull out. all the results were above the listed values in the catalog. according to me, hilti hit re-500 is one of the best adhesives available in the market for this application.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
anchors set in epoxy adhesive huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:07 PM
aci 318 appendix d huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:42 AM
datum reference style old new on y14.5m standard drawing huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:44 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:50 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多