几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 12:55 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 concrete testing labs

concrete testing labs
i've been getting reports in on concrete break strengths for a project. the majority of results of 7 day and 28 day strengths have seemed suspicious. today, i received a report of 2 sets of cylinder breaks. the 7 day was 4,950 and 4,990 psi, respectively. the 28 day strengths are 5,010, 5,020, and 5,060 for set one, and 5,130, 5,200, and 5,090 for set two.
has anyone heard of only a difference in 100 psi for 7 day and 28 day strengths? this concrete was normal weight, no special type of cement or curing admixtures used. similarly, on another report, i saw 7 day breaks at 3,100 psi and 28 day breaks at 3,200 psi.
i'm starting to think the testing lab is yanking my chain here.
i would guess that they are using a batch with type iii cement without knowing it. i would go back to the plant supplying the concrete and verify the mix design.
would ask the testing firm to explain results. could be simple typo errors or technician not knowing how to fill in the blanks. their reputation should mean a lot to them and funny numbers are bad for everyone. depending on size and importance of project, maybe you can make them do some field cores to verify in place strength.
one or more factors could be at play here, such as:
1. an accelerator or type iii cement as suggested by vmirat was used in the concrete mixture.
2. cylinders were not properly cured in the field and or laboratory.
3. mix-up in cylinders tested. this can happen when several classes(mix designs) of concrete are placed on the same day and identificaton of specimens is sloppy. the ability to track specimens with id number and match them with location concrete was placed is very important.
4. use of "magic pencil" to create results. let's keep our fingers crossed that this was not the case.
a few questions:
(i) did this problem happen for more than one different mix? i bring this up because some of the 28 day results are slightly over 5,000 psi and another one is just over 3,000 psi, suggesting more than one mix.
(ii) how do these results compare with results indicated in the mix design submitals? mixes proportioned on the basis of statistical analysis of field data are recommended.
(ii) have you ever visited the testing facility to examine their curing room, testing machines, calibration certs?
(iii) is the testing lab accredited for testing concrete cylinders?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
concrete sampling guidlines huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:34 PM
concrete roof slab load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:34 PM
concrete mix= reinfocing for exterior composit deck huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:19 PM
concrete corrosion in partial saturated condition huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:54 AM
chapter 4 preliminary design properties of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:44 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多