几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 11:28 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 checking flexure 2 edge of base plates

checking flexure @ edge of base plates
under what conditions do i need to manually check for flexure at the edge of base plate? when p is high? when -p is high? when anchor rods are located "outside" the col? all the time? have the design examples provided in the sdg's (both 1st and 2nd ed) already considered this?
the moment at the free edge of the baseplate is always 0, just like a cantilevered beam.
if you are talking about the "edge" of the plate where it meets the column, you always check the moment there - that is how you size the plate.
which edge? gonna have to be clearer about what failure pattern you're typing about.
failure mode is flexure of the base plate and whether it is sufficiently stiff. not actually the edge of the base plate, but the "edge" of the plate where it meets the column, per structuraleit. do you have to check whether it will fail in bending due to the axial compressive load? do you have to check whether it will fail in bending due to uplift? does it matter whether the anchor rods are situated "inside" the column, or situated "outside" it? the formulas as presented in aisc steel design guide series, both the original 2003 version and the 2006 second edition, have they taken account of the failure by bending?
the design of the baseplate for thickness is based on this failure that you are talking about - so yes, you have to check it. that is what drives the thickness of the baseplate. for gravity only the location of the anchor rods will not matter. for uplift the location of the anchor rods will make a difference. for moment at the base of the column with or without gravity/uplift, the location of the rods will matter, not only for the base plate thickness but also for the actual anchor rod design.
kk88818,
you need to look at aisc design guide 1 - design of column base plates.
csd
if you have a moment on the column in addition to the p load, you will also have to consider prying action in the design of the plate.
mike mccann
mccann engineering
you can consider the base plate portion in flexure is from the the point where the plate meets the column to the anchor/expansion bolts. this is the length of your "cantilevered beam" with the base at the column and the load p equal to the sum of all the tension loads. if you size the plate stiff enough, you can "neglect" the prying action. i use neglect with caution, so use your judgement.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
base plates at columns with brace gussett plates huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:28 PM
base plate design ignores corners of base plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:24 PM
aluminum column base plates huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:17 AM
value of drawing check huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 01:48 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:24 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多