几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 10:15 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 camber for steel beams

camber for steel beams
is there a rule of thumb for cambering steel beams? aisc doesn't seem to have much on the subject, except that it is up to the discretion of the engineer. i've usually just used the dead load deflection as my camber, but i've heard of also using a portion of the live load. my basic problem is i have a 30' span and can only sneak a w16 in. the dl is .5k/ft and ll is 1.25k/ft. in a similar situation, an engineer used a w16x45 c=3/4". the c=3/4" takes some legitimate ll deflection. any thoughts?
check out our whitepaper library.
like you i usually use dl only for determining camber. but i have include ll in some cases (chemical plants and refineries) where i need to reduce stresses in piping and equipment attached to the steel.
cambering for live load is generally not recommended, for several reasons:
1. actual live load is usually much lower than design live load.
2. deflections of steel beams are usually smaller than calculated due to end restraint of connections.
3. actual camber may be larger than specified due to standard tolerances.
4. excess camber can lead to problems placing decks and slabs.
5. over-reliance on camber produces beams with lower stiffness and can cause vibration problems.
for these reasons, most engineers do not camber for live load. in fact, many engineers only camber for a portion of the dead load, say 60% to 90% depending upon end restraint conditions.
i agree with the above and would like to note that we, in the bridge industry, do not camber plate girders for live loads only for dead load. we rarely camber rolled sections, preferring to make up the difference due to dead load deflections by increasing the thickness of the slab in a limited area which we refer to as a "haunch".
if we did camber for live load, the end product would be rolling hills on an otherwise flat application. due mainly to load that isn't there.
we use 70-75 % of dl deflection. deflection does not occur immediately. if 100% of dl deflection is used, headed studs may be too close to the top of slab, or above the top of slab (we had this case on one of the projects and learned from it).
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
camber - composite beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:14 PM
caisson structural slab wout interior grade beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 06:09 PM
bond beam location huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:19 PM
beams braced with a welded flat steel plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:12 PM
1961 laminate wood beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:44 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:01 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多