几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 05:51 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 built-up wood columns

built-up wood columns
hey all,
i've always assumed that wall sheathings such as plywood or osb, if adequately nailed, laterally brace wood columns in walls. what do you guys think and is there a upper limit to that?
describe what you mean by a "wood column"? is it similar to a 2 x 4 stud?
i personally agree with that. especially if the sheathing is continuous across the member face (not a column next to an opening). if the column forms the edge of an opening i apply the old school "bracing capacity needs to be 2% of column axial load" rule and check the sheathing buckling and nailing. of course, you may have blocking as well, which will only increase your lateral bracing capacity. sometimes i specify where sheathing joints are not allowed to gain some flexural action from the sheathing if the panel width is small.
note: remember construction loads! i have seen wood axial
depends on the width of the osb or plywood panel relative to the dimnension of the column you are trying to stiffen. if it's a four foot panel, no problem, but i would have a problem with only a foot.
i would consider gypboard the same way, but require a greater width of board to use as stiffening. this would apply to wood stud partition walls and bearing walls not used as shear walls.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
would you still feel the same if the plywood or osb got ve'd out and replaced with gypsum board?
ucfse:
not quite sure what you are getting at here, but, for any given width of wall, i would feel more comfortable with using osb or plywood than gypsum for lateral restraint of the weak axis of the load bearing wall studs.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
mike-
i think that's the point he was making. if you design assuming you have plywood and then later on they decide to get rid of the plywood and forget to tell you.
and maybe this is obvious, but the sheathing will only brace the column in one direction. as with individual wall studs, buckling will still occur in the direction perpendicular to the sheathing.
daveatkins
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
built up wood beam suppor huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:48 PM
built up wood beam adequacy huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:48 PM
brick veneer on wood sill plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:58 PM
brick cladded wood studs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:47 PM
4 story wood building with steel beams and columns at the fi huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:45 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:21 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多