几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 05:31 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 building code to use

building code to use.
i am civil engineer, one friend of my asked me to design his a 2 floor single house in los angeles, california.
i went to the la city web and its calls for the ibc 2002, and says that is based on the ubc 1997, can i use the ubc 1997 for the design?. i used this code many years ago, when i was woorking in this field, and i am very familiar with it, but i change my field of work to civil road design. is anybody knows if i have to use other or more recently code like ibc 2006 or i can use the 1997 ubc? thank you.
you have to use the code adopted by the jurisdiction of the project. i would contact the local building official to see what the current code is.
don phillips
there is no ibc 2002. there is an ibc 2000 and an ibc 2003. my understanding is that california uses the 1997 ubc, still. however, some of the ca engineers know better than i. what about ibc 2006?
the current code is the 2002 city of los angeles building code. it is based on the 2001 california bldg code (cbc) and the 1997 ubc. in addition numerous information bulletins, research reports etc may have to be utilized in design.
if this is not something you do on a regular basis, the hassle may not be worth it.
houses usually fall under irc not ibc.
yes, irc if adopted by the jurisdiction. some states have state codes, some do not and it is up to the local jurisiction to adopt a code for 1 and 2 family dwellings. sounds like the la code is based on the 97 ubc with local amendments called the 2002 labc.
to answer the original post, you have to design to the 2002 la code, or at least, review the local amendments to see how the 97 ubc is modified.
don phillips
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
building code in huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:31 PM
british columbia building code 2006 question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:18 PM
ada, osha and code violations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:09 AM
2001 ca. building code huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:24 AM
【转帖】nls error yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 06:34 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:01 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多