几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 05:19 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 british wind loading codes

british wind loading codes
anyone have any information on where i can get some information on the british wind loading specifications or where i can download the specification?
find a job or post a job opening
uk codes are available from british standards institution
you will need bs6399 loading for buildings - part 2: code of practice for wind loads - 1997. the current version incorporates amendment no1, corrigendum no 1 and is corrected and reprinted june 2002. - all this is on the front cover!
my company designs parabolic antennas. we have reliable wind tunnel test that provide drag coefficients for the wind at different angles to the antenna. i can use the basic wind pressure calculated from asce 7, along with these drag coefficients to determine the loads on the antenna. my question is, if we advertise our antennas as meeting a 125 mph wind, what basic pressure would a customer using the british code think a 125 mph wind would be?
i should have stated this clearly from the beginning.
you will need the code. the short answer is the uk code is based on a 3 second gust and 1 in 50 year return period. there is a map with ground level wind speeds for the whole of the uk. the wind force is calculated (after applying may coefficients which can be greater that 2) using the equation wind force qs = 0.613v^2, where v is the wind speed. the wind force is then multipled by a cooefficient due to the shape - (for instance - free standing sign boards have a factor of 1.8). the appendices give information on the requirements of wind tunnel testing and on how to derive extreme wind events.
bs6399-2 is only applicable to static and mildly dynamic structures. if your antenna is classed as dynamic the code does not apply.
125mph is 55.8m/s which would be reasonable for most areas of the uk and for buildings of heights up to 100m. some very high and exposed areas may have winds stronger than 125mph, but you are likely to have good coverage.
obviously we have different codes for the design of materials as well...
the 3 second gust and 50 year storm are the same as asce 7. it sounds like the basic calculation is similar.
does the british code allow for any kind of stress increase due to wind and dead weight only forces, or a decrease in the load factor?
is the classification of a dynamic structure based on the natural frequency?
there is a building type factor (re
interesting as asce 7 has a safety factor of 1.6 for wind.
okay, i checked out the spreadsheet you referenced and i might be able to use it. i'll also check the snow loading and appreciate the reminder.
thanks for all the valuable information.
regards
hank
i got the bs 6399-2 document you informed me about. the 1.4 factor you mentioned was something i decided to check into. we happened to have a 1990 version of bs 5950 part 1, and when checking into getting the latest version, i discovered that it was quite expensive. in the version we have, table 2 seems to be the pertinent factors for our purposes. i hate to ask my company to spend that much money for just this little bit of information. could you tell me if that table is still the same?
dead load 1.4
dead load acting with wind and imposed load 1.2
imposed load 1.6
imposed load acting with wind 1.2
wind load 1.4

regards
hank
ha!
i have bs5950 part 1 2000 on my desk and extacts from the 1985 (original) version. i don't have the 1990 version around.
table 2 is much bigger in the 2000 version but contains basically the same information as the 1985 version - i infer that the 1990 version would look like either the 1985 version or the 2000 version. i can't remember - it is not the part of the code the gets committed to memory. if it was different i would know! extracting and paraphrasing from the 2000 version, the following partial safety factors seem relevant:
dead load (alone and with imposed loads) 1.4
dead load with imposed and wind 1.2
then there are factors for cranes...
dead load resisting uplift 1.0
imposed load 1.6
imposed load with wind load 1.2
wind load 1.4
wind load with imposed load 1.2
there is then half a page of factors for tanks, earth pressures, temperature effects and various crane forces acting in combination with dead, imposed and wind...none of which probably have any effect on your case(?)
i read the table (both 1985 and 2000) to mean the following load combinations:
1.4dl + 1.6il
1.0dl + 1.4wl
1.4dl + 1.4wl
1.2dl + 1.2il + 1.2wl
imposed load (il) is live load and/or snow load.
for uplift conditions, convention in uk practice is to use the load factor of 1.0 on dead loads that are deemed to always be there. if there is a component of dead load that is removable this is usually assumed to be removed when its presence could be beneficial. a nebulous written justification often accompanies the establishment of a partial safety factor of 0.9 or thereabouts.
serviceability calculations are based on partial safety factors of 1.0 for dead, imposed and wind conditions but clause 2.5.1 states: '...in the case of combined imposed load and wind load only 80% of the full specified values need be considered when checking serviceability...'
i assume that the practice is similar in the us?
we are now potentially talking about actual loads on a physical structure. please re
i am concluding that since our structures are predominately loaded with wind, the asce 7 load factor of 1.6 for wind and 1.2 for dead load will effectively insure that our antenna’s will meet the british design code. however we will provide this basic information to our customers so that a determination can be made about further verification they may feel is necessary.
i understand your concern regarding comments you have made and want to assure you that they will not be used any further than our discussion here on this forum.
thank you again for the information and your valuable time.
regards
hank
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
balcony guardrail wind huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:11 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM
asce 7-05 open building gable wind loading huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:08 PM
asce 7 wind loading of perforated surfaces huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:59 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:26 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多