几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 04:41 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 bracing for moment frame

bracing for moment frame
dear all,
i am working on a multi-story frame constructed with hollow structural steel. the client's preference for this is due to hygenice reasons and all my connections are welded moment connections. i have some horizontal tubes for my structure. i am wondering whether additional bracing in terms of x- or diagonal bracing on the horizontal platforms would be beneficial. i do not have any vertical bracing at all due to the constraints of equipment and access. any advice?
thanks.
find a job or post a job opening
is this in a high seismic zone? i'm not sure if there are many (if any) approved moment connections between tubes for high seismic.
here are the 2% pe in 50 year
the 0.2 sec spectral response acceleration is 32.05
the 1.0 sec spectral response acceleration is
12.06
i'm working on the same problem, client like tubes. im my case i talked them into bracing.
for your case, horizontal bracing only helps if you have a vertical stability system (vert bracing, moment frames, shear walls) in place to transfer lateral load to ground.
from what you wrote, sounds like you will need to use moment (rigid) frames. this will likely drive up your column sizes to twice what they are now, due to k (effective length factor) and seismic loads are higher for moment frames due to lower r (response) number.
sometimes the big columns and expensive moment connections will have your client make adjustments and use the "king of vertical stability".......x-bracing>
ball park loads (guess) will be around 15-20% of mass form moment frame. please verify that with code.
hope that helps.
diagonals in both vertical planes are the simple solution to lateral load with any shape steel system. moment connections and induced bending in the columns/beams is high cost in terms of engineering, materials and rigidity.
diagonals in the horizontal plane are usually redundant to floors/roofs/slabs.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
braced frame brace element question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:37 PM
braced frame beam unbraced length fo axial huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:37 PM
bottom chord bracing for cold form trusses huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:28 PM
attaching geometric tolerance frame to a surface huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 04:55 PM
【转帖】composite two-single feature frame position tolerance yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:00 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:41 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多