几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 03:54 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 blast resistant structure

blast resistant structure
i was assigned to design a store house for explosive material.can i use bs 8110 to do the design or tm5 1300 will be a better recommendation?is there any significant differences between the 2 standard?
try refering to factory mutual guidelines datasheet 1-44 damage limiting construction.
one key thing to remember is that internal explosion and external blasts present different loading criteria.
internal blast generally requires relief (blow-out panels) or reflected pressures significantly increase the overall blast load on the structure. factory mutual has information for designing (laboratory) chemical storage rooms for upto 100 psf.
if you are designing for munitions storage, then internal blast is almost impossible to contain. but blast resistant design is used for munitions bunkers, primarily to protect contents from other bunkers that may blow-up or nearby explosions from hostile attack.
asce manual no. 42 used to be a useful tool, but is no longer published. since refineries and petrochemical plants are major customers for blast resistant design, they probably have some of the best literature these days, but it is proprietary. the us military also has some useful literature, but again access for civilians could be a little problematic.
i'm not familiar with any of the codes that you listed.
design pressures for refinery control buildings fall in the 10-25 psi range generally. for munitions bunkers it is in the 100 psi range. in addition to the initial blast pressure considerations, munitions storage bunker design requires control of "missile" momentum from concrete that is spalled off the structure from the blast deflected elements. too high, and these "missiles" could cause the contents of this bunker to also explode.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
blast resistant design literature huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:53 PM
blast loadspressures huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:53 PM
blast design advances huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:52 PM
armory structure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:52 PM
【转帖】ordinate dimensions to define gdt datum structure yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:04 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:36 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多