几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 01:18 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 asce 7-98 7.9 sliding snow

asce 7-98 7.9 sliding snow
in 7.9 sliding snow, it is stated, "the solid lines in fig. 7-2 shall be used to determine the total extra load available from the upper roof, regardless of the surface of the upper roof."
how is this being done? i do not understand how fig. 7-2 explains this.
thank you!
check out our whitepaper library.
asce 7-98, 7.9 merely states that all snow sliding off of an upper roof to a lower roof shall be calculated as the total snow load on the lower roof using the solid line (which is "all other roofs") of table 7.2 (not the dashed line, which is for "unobstructed slippery surfaces") under balanced loading conditions.
"regardless of the surface of the upper roof" means whether it is considered an "unobstructed slippery surface" or "all other roofs".
erv,
if the extra load caused by snow sliding off a sloped roof onto a lower roof shall be determined assuming that all the snow that accumulates on the upper roof under the balanced loading condition slides onto the lower roof, why then should i go any further to figure 7-2? we have our answer. the balanced snow of the upper roof!
why refer to the solid lines of figure 7-2 to determine the "total extra load" when the "extra load" has previously been determined?
the solid line at figure 7-2, for warm roofs, decreases from 7 on 12 and steeper roofs. would'nt a steeper roof have more total extra load available than a shallower roof?
what am i overlooking?
eit2,
take a close look at figure 7-2, this merely states (the solid line) that you must take cs (slope factor) at the higher curve. cs may not be less than 0 or more than 1.0 regardless of slope. even though 7-2a starts at 7 on 12 slope, for a 3 on 12 slope you use cs at 1.0.
erv,
thank you for making this more clear.
one more question. would you consider the unbalanced load sliding from the upper roof? why or why not?
thank you, again!
eit2,
no. there is no need to consider the unbalanced load since all the snow load from the upper roof is assumed to slide onto the lower roof (the reason for the steeper curve).
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
asce 7-05, 7-02, 7-98 confusion huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:15 PM
asce 7-05 sliding snow provisions huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:13 PM
asce 7-05 revised unbalanced snow load question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:10 PM
asce 17-96 para. 4.2.5 load combinations seiasce 7-02 com huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:54 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:53 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多