几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 11:42 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 analyzing parking garage for large crowd of people

analyzing parking garage for large crowd of people
i am in charleston sc where the city is about to open a new bridge. they are having an opening ceremony for the bridge with fireworks and one of our clients has asked us to check the capacity of their parking garage because he is expecting a large crowd of people for the firework display. the drawings were sealed in 1979 and they show this to be a prestressed structure with a design live load of 50 psf on the typical parking levels. my first thought was that vehicles weigh more than people but then normally the design live load for lobbies and other large gathering areas is typically 100 psf. any ideas of a simple analysis to determine that the owner of the building has no need to worry or if he should limit the number of people and/or vehicles in the parking garage?

find your worst case horizontal and vertical
fbaxley - 100 psf is typical loading for elevated industrial platforms. for the structure to actually be subjected to that load, the people must be standing essentially shoulder-to shoulder. the checks that astructurale has suggested sound reasonable. however many building codes, including ibc, do not allow live load reduction for public assembly live loads of 100 psf, or greater.
i live near charleston and am familiar with the parking garage that you are talking about. perhaps you could check with your client and see if there have been events in the past, such as during the cooper river bridge run or spoleto, when the structure has experienced similar loading.
agree with slideruleera - also - with large groups of people, you also run the risk of music playing and people bouncing up and down in unison, creating extra impact forces.
astrucurale's point on checking the "best view" side is a good one and it also leads right into "unbalanced loading" checks that should be made.
jae's comment about the effect of music on crowds is very good too. the university of wisconsin is noted for a number of things and one is their "5th quarter" after their football games. the marching band whips the crowd into a frenzy dancing the polka in the stands (). the precast structure swayed so much that an extensive investigation and reinforcement program was undertaken back in the 80's.
there was a hockey arena problem 20 yrs. ago.
when a goal was scored . . . the crowd all rose up in unison. maybe weight + 2g loading?
your "first thought was that vehicles weigh more than people" is seriously flawed.
the persons that can fit in a given space weigh more than the vehicles that can fit in that space, even if each person individually weighs less than a car. a car is as wide as approximately four persons standing shoulder-to-shoulder and as long as 10-20 persons standing front to back. therefore, you might have 40-80 persons in the space normally occupied by each car. combined, they would weigh more than a single car.
there was a case in which a bridge "flattened out" when it was closed to traffic and filled with humans for its anniversary celebration. it did not do this when filled with cars. engineers had to calculate (while this was happening, because no one thought of it in advance) whether the bridge was safe like that.
the problem of humans moving is unison to music is real. this may have been a contributing factor to the famous incident in which the internal elevated walkways/balconies in a hotel atrium collapsed during dancing.
you also need to consider the issue of the walls, fences, or guardrails at the edges of each deck, and make sure that when the crowd surges toward the edge, they do not either push anyone off or crush anyone. there have been several cases in which crowds crushed large numbers of persons to death without knowing it, most famously one at a soccer match in the uk, but also one in ny city at the bottom of a wide staircase leading to a narrow open door to a charity basketball game. parking garages typically contain vehicles of normal width and going singly and slowly, and are not usually subject to large forces from a crowd, and do not usually need to contain anything narrower than a vehicle going with more force than a single person.
stephenweinstein,
firstly i think you are unnecessarily hard on fbaxley for the original post. it is clear from that post that the difference in loading is understood. i.e. 50 psf to 100 psf.
the remainder of your post is very good and raises points not previously addressed.
i don't know anything about the bridge which 'flattened out' but clearly in that case the owner was not as smart as fbaxley's.
the elevated walkways are the now infamous hyatt hotel (in kansas?)
the uk soccer match was at hillsborough stadium but as you say there have been many other similar situations.
horizontal barriers in a parking garage would be inappropriate to restrain crowds even if they were strong enough as they are designed to take force at bumper level not waist/chest height.
if crowds are to form in this garage, then temporary restraint barriers should be provided. whilst these would impose loading on to the floor (or columns) there is a possibility that they could be positioned back from the edge to aleviate the worst of the floor loading problems.
finally my guess is that fbaxley's client, when faced with the possible problems of loading, will either prohibit the use of the garage as a viewing platform or tightly control the numbers of people who can do so.
jheidt2543,
polka dancers in a frenzy is a hard thing to visualize, even for me, and i live in wisconsin. but it was true.
i think it had something to do with beer.

-mike
lots of beer. add 8 lbs. per aveage person in wi. for that. but only at uw madison.
. . . and don't forget to account for the possible deterioration of the existing elements (corrosion, vehicular damage, etc.).
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
30mpa parking garage concrete slab vs. 35mpa huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:39 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:48 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多