几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 11:31 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 american standard channels - aisc 9th

american standard channels - aisc 9th
i am preparing some miscellaneous steel shop drawing details. i want to have a gusset connector plate shop welded to a c12x20.7. aisc 9th gives the average flange thickness, grip and "k" dimension. but what is the actual thickness at the extreme toe end/edge of the flange?
thank you ...
i don't know. but the slope, i believe, is a 1 in 6 slope. you can locate the average thickness at the midpoint, draw the sloped line through it, and be reasonably close. i'm not sure if the average thickness is based on the flange area through the web, or to the line of the web, which would alter it a bit- and the average thickness could perhaps include some of the radius material.
thickness at base of flange = 0.723"
thickness at tip of flange = 0.280"
at least that is what they were in 1923, for a carnegie steel (us steel predecessor) c2 with 2.94" flange (current designation c12x20.7).
go to my website homepage (link below) and download "carnegie pocket companion - 1923". see the figure on page 27.
probably are minor variations from other manufacturers (and other time periods), but even today the above numbers should be reasonable.
tip thickness is misleading because there is a radius at the tip.
deutero,
since you're a detailer, you probably can do this. i did it with autocad.
1. draw back of web (vert line)
2. draw outside face of flange (hor line)
3. offset flange face by distance k = 1.125" (this gives hor centerline of fillet.)
4. offset back of web by 0.282" (this give inside face of web.)
5. offset that by r = 0.50". (this gives vert centerline of fillet.)
6. draw line through intersection of both cl's at slope of 1:6. (jstephen is correct about slope.)
7. offset this line by r = 0.50". (this give inside face of flange.
8. put in a fillet of r = 0.50" to the inside face of web and inside face of flange.
9. measure or dimension the distane from the intersection of fillet and inside flange face to outside face of flange, i measure 0.6318". (slightly different from slideruleera's value from 1923 carnegie.)
10. also, offset back of flange by g = 1.75"
11. measure or dimension distance between outside face of flange and inside face of flange at this location, it is 0.4568". that is closer to 7/16" than it is to 1/2", but maybe they round up for the grip.
12. offset back of web by 3" to find tip of flange.
13. measure or dimension distance between both flange faces at this location. i measure 0.2484". (slightly different from slideruleera's value from 1923 carnegie.)
13. ifrs is correct about the radius on the tip of flange, but i do not know that value.
i think that gives you a good enough picture of a c12x20.7
regards,
chichuck
chichuck,
thank you for the information. two questions:
what resource do you and jstephen have that tells you the inside flange face is a 1:6 slope?
what resource do you have that tells you the "g" value and what does it represent? also, re: #10, did you mean to say "offset back of web" or am i misunderstanding?
thank again ...
chichuck,
is this "g" value available in a resourse for all channels or applicable shapes?
1:6 slope is standard for american standard beams (s-shapes) and american standard channels (c-shapes). that's like asking for verification that the sky is blue!
look in the asd manual (green book) page 1-9.
nutte,
thank you for the reference.
i typically star people for informing me of something i did'nt know. why did you have to add the insult?
no insult, just being funny. this is up for debate.
deutero,
i found the g value, the distance from back of channel to normal gage line in an old (1978) bethlehem steel shapes book. i think it used to be in the older aisc manuals (7th and 8th editions) but i dont have those handy to check. i'm pretty sure the value i gave is still good, i don't think those have changed.
also, i don't thinkd nutte was trying to be insulting, he's just ribbin you a bit. though i was amused by it, you are asking about something that is somewhat obscure. see astm a6 - 95c in section 3.1.2.7 for channels and section 3.1.2.5 for s shapes, there you find flange slope at 16 2/3% slope = 1:6.
regards,
chichuck
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
what are the guidelines to create a new standard huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 01:54 PM
datum reference style old new on y14.5m standard drawing huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:44 PM
【转帖】what are the guidelines to create a new standard yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 11:13 AM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:55 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多