几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 09:19 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 aashto 8.17.2.1.3 if the depth of

aashto 8.17.2.1.3 if the depth of ...
in reference to aashto 8.17.2.1.3 "if the depth of the side face of a member exceeds 3 feet, longitudinal skin reinforcement shall be uniformly distributed along both side faces of the member for a distance d/2 nearest the flexural tension reinforcement. the area of skin reinforcement (ask) per foot of height on each side face shall be => 0.012(d-30). the maximum spacing of skin reinforcement shall not exceed the lesser of d/6 and 12 inches. such reinforcement may be included in strength computations if a strain compatibility analysis is made to determine stresses in the individual bars or wires. the total area of longitudinal skin reinforcement in both faces need not exceed one-half of the required flexural tensile reinforcement." if i have a hammerhead pier, does this apply to the cantilever portion of the pier cap ?

hello,
i believe this requirement relates more to reinforced concrete grade beams than pier caps.
regards,
phil
i contacted georgia dot bridge engineering department 3/28 and asked mr. john tiernan about this. he said this was a change in the amount of skin reinforcement required for deep beams from the previous aashto edition and should be required for the cantilever part of this hammerhead pier.
edward,
i would agree that it would apply to your cantilever. it appears this would apply to any deep beam, such as a pier cap on columns or hammerhead. our state dot, ohio, interprets this the same way also.
mike
edward1,
my answer to your post is "yes".
at times we have to read the code sentence by sentence and conform to it. in your design case for instance;
are you designing a flexural member? yes
is it deeper than 3 feet? yes
then the article in question applies.
in the case of pier caps where we are dealing with deep sections you will have to provide some facia steel. we never leave it unprotected, this article is a good starting point as to the amount of steel. i am not sure as which would always govern but check temp/shrinkage steel at 0.125 in²/foot also, it may translate to more steel.
good luck
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
hread depth specifying - sanity check requested huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 01:20 PM
depth of a cb hole on a incline huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:51 PM
【转帖】hread depth specifying - sanity check requested yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 10:42 AM
【转帖】hread depth callou yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 10:41 AM
【转帖】decimal dimensioningfractional equivalents yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:35 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多