几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 09:14 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 a36 anchor rod embed length

a36 anchor rod embed length
i have (4) 1" dia. a36 anchor rods, each carrying 22k tension. i am trying to determine their embedment length into a 3' dia concrete pier. i cannot use the aci development length equations because they are smooth, not deformed, bars. i referred to the aisc lrfd manual table 8-26 (p. 8-90 of the connections manual)and it requires a minimum of 12d, or 12" which i cannot believe is adequate (just my engineering judgement). others have suggested to calculate the embedment length based on a bond stress of 100 to 120 psi. using 120 psi, this gives a length of about 58" which seems excessive. i cannot use headed anchors because the failure cones interfere since the concrete pier is only 3' dia.
suggestions?
motorcity,
try using vertical rebar and determine the embedment length of the rebar, which will be the embedment depth of the bolt (plus cover and shear cone from center of bolt to rebar, see ref below). the rebar has to be extended/detailed below the bolt enough to develop the rebar's strength.
use fisher's aisc manual for industrial buildings.
just used this for bigger bolts (3" to 6") in chile and it really saved depth and width of foundation.
if you need more info just post again.
my understanding is that you you can either develop shear cone or provide adequate pier reinforcement. there is an article in aisc engineering journal fourth quarter 1992 by mario scacco which uses 12d for a36 on either basis. article by shipp in second quarter 1983 goes into pier reinforcement in great detail, and also uses 12d. i am not up to speeed yet on aci 318 design requirements.
i do it the way dig1 does it. see aisc design guide 7, "industrial buildings" for more info. you can download it from the aisc website, but it will cost you unless your an aisc
i don't see why you can't use headed anchors. even if the failure cones interfere, that doesn't mean you have zero strength- just reduced strength.
in a pier, i always lap the anchor bolts with the vertical bars in the pier suffiently to develop the required strength in the pier reinforcing. otherwise, the top of the pier would pull off of the reinforcing.
however, if the area of your pier is sufficiently large, the concrete alone will be strong enough to resist the tension.
but the fact that you are using smooth, unheaded rods is something that may control, and i don't know what the bond to a smooth rod would be. can't you use "all-thread", where the entire rod is threaded?
daveatkins
sounds like there are a few good suggestions:
unfortunately, i'm not a member of aisc so i don't have access to any of their
i would use all-thread rod and a nut and thick washer at the end to make it "headed". then use the aci 318-02 appendix d to calculate the pullout capacity of the rods. you have to consider steel strength, concrete break-out strength, hook or head strength, and blow-out of the side face. all of these are included in the aci. concrete break-out strength will be influenced by the group interaction and the edge distances of the
i am going to give a response, but i first want to make a general observation. in terms of allowable stress design if you have (4) 1" dia a36 anchors then your allowable tension is 19.1 ksi per table 1-b asd. with 22k per bolt your stress is 28 ksi. so you may want to take another look at your numbers even if you are using an upset rod, unless these are lrfd numbers. to design the anchorage i would use headed anchors and i would use the aci-02 approach which is most current. you will get a failure plane along the perimeter of the column based on a 35 degree projection cone. the aci theory is based on unreinforced concrete. use the development of from the top of your perimeter bars above the failure plane to determine the extra capacity you get from the rebar. if it is not enough, extend the anchors deeper until you can develop the strength and or hook the tops of the bars and use the hooked development length. if you don't use the vertical rebar to help hold the cone then you will not generate enough capacity.
for a36 anchor bolts you need to use a headed bolt, nut or hook on the end of the rod to develop pullout strength. you can not rely on any bond development to a smooth rod. aci 318 appendix d is the source required for most building codes in the us. where there is no applicable building code i have used 25 bolt diameters as a general guide when used inside a rebar cage with a minimum of 6" from bolt to bolt or bolt to edge of concrete.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】using width and length of a recess as dimensioning datums yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 11:08 AM
【转帖】increasing length of part, want pattern instances to match yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-13 12:14 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:06 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多