几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 11:22 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 indication of projected tolerance zone for thru holes

indication of projected tolerance zone for thru holes
asme y14.5m-1994
if you have a thru hole that you are using a projected tolerance zone with do you need to show which direction the projection goes with a chain line & dimension as in 5-34?
initially i was thinking you did (as just puting it in the fcf doesn't tell you which side the zone is projected) but then started to think that it doesn't matter if you inspect the projected tolerance on the front or back it will control the 'perpendicularity' of the hole the same.
in my case the holes are for dowels that are being used as linear guides for another part to slide along, although i don't think it makes a difference, the same would be true for a threaded hole.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
check out our whitepaper library.
man, you got me thinking there. i would say since the standard specifically shows how to detail it, then do so. it seems 5.5.2 is pretty clear on this.
as far as your reasoning goes, i guess it wouldn't make a difference is the projected zone at the same place in both directions, but how often is that going to happen? 5.5.3. says the positional tolerences only applies to the height of the projecting portion of the stud or pin after installation. unless you insert your pin so that it protrudes equally on both sizes, i don't see how this is possible without detailing with a chain line, especially if the pin sticks out on both sides unequally (which isn't an uncommon event).
this is just some initial thoughts give you something to bounce your question off of.
matt lorono
cad engineer/ecn analyst
silicon valley, ca
if in doubt, show it. both sides, if neccessary. a blind hole can only be interpreted one way. a threaded to a specific depth can only project one way.
however, a thru dowel hole, you might want the lengths indicated on both sides (same length or different).
a 0.2mm diameter zone for a part thickness of 10mm yeilds = .02 tangent.
add a 10mm projected tol. zone it becomes 0.2/20 or 0.01 tangent.
if you add 10mm projected tol. zone on both sides, it becomes 0.2/30 = 0.0067 tanget.
ok, i've convinced myself it does matter which side, i'll be adding it in (or back in, i put it once then deleted it).
it doesn't make a differenct to the 'angle' of the hole but does effect the location so is needed.
fcsuper & weavedreamer thanks.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
although the standard is not explicit about this, you will find in fig 5-33,34 that direction and orientation is directly related to the primary datum of the drf as specified in the fcf. i have found that when i am considering applying the ptz, i must make sure that i have identified a "functional" drf that not only conveys function of the component/features but captures the assembly sequence/process which is the premise behind calling out a ptz. so if all understand this per the standard, a chain line is not necessary, however if it helps communicate to others who don't, a chain line is an acceptable alternative method of specification.
as a side note please be aware that the ptz is applicable to the projected axis of the ame of the hole as a resultant of the manufactured feature hole from the drf specified in the fcf, not the actual axis of the hole, although derived from. if perhaps a "fastener" is required on both sides of the hole another datum needs to be specified on the the opposite side and a second callout with this datum applied as primary in the fcf is necessary. i hope this helps.
vwm
good point xplicator, my datums are set up that way however i don't have confidence that the machine shops we use will be as knowledgable as you so i think the chain is probably appropriate in my case.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
promoting, selling, recruiting and student posting
are not allowed in the forums.
(add stickiness to your site by linking to this professionally managed technical forum)
title: drafting standards,
description: drafting standards, gd&t & tolerance analysis technical support forum and mutual help system for engineering professionals. selling and recruiting forbidden.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】projected tolerance zone yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:32 PM
【转帖】pattern locating tolerance zone shape yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:13 PM
【转帖】indication of projected tolerance zone for thru holes yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 08:31 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:06 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多