几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-04, 05:38 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 cylinder surface as a datum

cylinder surface as a datum
i have an old drawing showing a cylinder in profile and specifying the side of the cylinder as a datum. that datum is referenced by another cylinder elsewhere in the weldment, making a side of that cylinder parallel to the datum.
is this an allowable call out? i'm thinking the datum and feature control should be referencing the axis, not the sides.
eng-tips forums is member supported.
you are correct that the datum is referencing the axis. the location of the callout is also a correct one, if it is simply pointing to or connected to the profile of the cylinder.
cwdaniel,
your datum must be a real feature that can be fixtured to. with asme y14.5m-1994, a datum on an axis is a mistake.
your drawing probably is correct.
apparently, an iso standard somewhere allows you to place datums on axes, but i have not seen it explained. i have no idea what it would mean.
jhg
these cylindracal features are actually tubes so i'd say the id of a tube can be fixtured to if it's important.
can't holes or other id's be used as a datum and that applies to the axis of the feature?
in this case though the outside is probably more useful for fixturing.
yes
one can have one side of a cylindrical feature as a datum but that is unusual. if the designer really wanted this, then there would be an end view with a phantom line tangent to the diameter and the datum designation symbol attached.
i belive that your designer wanted the c/l of the cylindrical feature and should have reflected this a bit differently.
holes and other ids are used as datums and should be. it depends upon how the part assembles.
if the part assembles with bolts protruding throught some holes, then one of the holes is the secondary datum and all dimensions come from that hole. there would be a 3rd datum or teriary that is used to orient (rotate) the part.
dave d.
while it may be poor practice, i don't think the design intent was to designate one side of the cylinder as a datum, but was used as a shortcut rather than tying the datum to a diameter dimension. dimensions are sometimes (again not preferred) placed such that the dimension lines are within the part boundary, which would be a similar case.
i realize i am looking at an older book, but i rely on my drafting book from college which is engineering design graphics, seventh ed., by james h. earle. it states on page 358 that the "cylindrical datum feature" is the axis of a true cylinder. in other words, two of the three required planes are represented as being the perpindicular centerlines intersecting at the axis of the shaft. this should be noted as a datum surface symbol in the circular view of the shaft. this practice may have changed with newer standards.
as explained to me recently during a course on bs8888 gd&t, you can only use the following as datums...
points, edges, axes' and surfaces...
any part of a surface of a cylinder would be classed as a profile and would not qualify as a datum.
the axis of the cylinder is the datum and the other cylinder on the weldment should be referenced to it. the form of the cylinders should be controlled by additional tolerances such as cylindricity and run out etc...
hyd'
draftsmandon,
time to get the actual standard. the datum may be the axis of a cylinder, but the datum feature is the cylinder itself. as far a locating the datum callout, that is more a matter of preference, as long as it does not violate y14.5. it is just as correct to link the callout to a cylindrical dimension in a side view as it is to a circular dimension in an end view (of a cylinder).
the best way to think of this is, where would you dimension the feature from? if you wouldn't attach the dimension to the centerline, you wouldn't attach the datum identifier to the centerline. the centerline is the datum but in order to make it a datum you must have a verifiable feature to measure from, hence attaching the datum indentifier to either the extension line of a dimension, a diameter callout or the edge of the feature.
read section 4 of the asme y14.5m-1994 standard.
david
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】profile of a surface vs irregular shape as a datum yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:28 PM
【转帖】points to define a datum yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:18 PM
【转帖】lever drf callou yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 08:40 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】cylinder surface as a datum yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:10 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:04 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多