几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » American standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-04-29, 08:15 PM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】good example of engineering drawing

good example of engineering drawing
hi all,
i'm looking for a good sample part drawing done to y14.5m.
can anybody supply a drawing, or show me where i can download one?
thanks,
ant77
the asme y14.5 specification has example figures of applying the tolerance to parts. isn't that suitable?
--scott
that's a really general request. i can give you a drawing of a solid cylinder, it will have exactly 2 dimensions on it but it will be perfect to asme y14.5m-1994, or are you looking for something that correctly represents all aspects of asme y14.4m-1994 in a single drawing? if you are looking for a comprehensive drawing to base all other drawings off of, don't count on finding it. i have never seen one that even comes close. you are better off just getting a copy of the standard. if you need to show someone what a y14.5m drawing looks like, you will have better luck drawing one yourself.
best of luck,
david
the thing to consider before using only the standard is para 1.1.4 "the figures in this standard are intended only as illustrations to aid the user in understanding the principals and methods of dimensioning and tolerancing described in the text. the absence of a figure illustrating the desired application is neither reason to assume inapplicability, nor basis for drawing rejection. in sime instances, figures show added detail for emphasis. in other instances, figures are incomplete by intent. numerical values of dimensions and tolerances are illustrative only."
in other words, use the standard to understand the principals and methods, not as a bible for how a correct drawing will look.
i suggest checking out tec-ease or genium for more valid examples, though they too will probably have similar limitations.
i would be happy to help you out, but i'm not allowed to send out dwgs. sorry.
chris
systems analyst, i.s.
solidworks 06 4.1/pdmworks 06
autocad 06
i haven't seen a good drawing in ten years or so.
ant77, you might be better off submitting a drawing that represents your best abilities at y14.5 and have the group make comments / suggestions from there. it may be daunting to face that kind of feedback, but it's an amazing learning opportunity for you, and you'll appreciate how difficult it is to get everyone to agree on a "compliant" drawing.
jim sykes, p.eng, gdtp-s
profile services
cad-documentation-gd&t-product development
thanks all. as one of you pointed out, examples in standards can be quite detached. to get the full picture you really need to see, well, the full picture!
yes, i would like to put a drawing before my other cad managers and say "here is a drawing done to y14.5m" and review it as a whole.
i have tried posting drawings here for critique before, but written feedback on a drawing has it's limitations - especially for visual people.
perhaps somebody knows of a nasa, boeing, automaker, or other institution's repository of drawings on the web (maybe parts that are put out to tender, or included in public specifications)?. or maybe you have seen a drawing used in a course or presentation that is freely available on the web? or do you have an old drawing you would be free to share?
thanks,
ant77
dwgs from nasa or boeing are not downloadable unless you work for a specific project and have access to it. those employees can lose their jobs if they do it.
also, most people have their interpretation of y14.5. you need to purchase the spec and read it. i suggest going for training.
for us to send you a dwg, imo, is not a good way to learn 14.5.
chris
systems analyst, i.s.
solidworks 06 4.1/pdmworks 06
autocad 06
like jim suggested, your best bet i think would be for you to post something and have someone redimension it. are you working to another standard currently? are you just trying to convince your boss to switch to the new standard? unfortunately just showing someone a drawing that is produced to asme y14.5m-1994 is not a very good way to convince them to change, unless your current drawings are a real mess, and then the best way is to show them how much cleaner the drawing would be after applying the standard.
along with aardvarkdw's comment, people (managers in particular) need to become educated about the value and impact of gd&t as a whole. otherwise, it won't matter how clean the drawings look to them; pretty drawings don't sell product and they will reject the changes.
jim sykes, p.eng, gdtp-s
profile services
cad-documentation-gd&t-product development
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】engineering change orders yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:52 PM
【转帖】drawing number system - do you still indicate dwg sie in the yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:45 PM
【转帖】decimal dimensioningfractional equivalents yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:27 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多