几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 10:43 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 cantilevered concrete deck with radius

cantilevered concrete deck with radius
i am designing a 6" concrete deck that will have about a 5' cantilevered radius portion (picture a half-circle cantilever). i am trying to come up with an efficient design and not get carried away with reinforcement. putting in rebar that follows the radius looks good on paper, but is not very effective at design. a series of varying length bars seems to work better for design, but then i have curved sections without reinforcment at the ends. maybe a combination of the two is best.
any recommendations?
the cantilevered deck would be a one way slab. your primary reinforcement for flexure and shear will run parallel to the cantilever. these bars would be varying lengths to extend out to the end of the cantilever.
in the opposite direction you would only have temp & shrinkage reinforcement. the bars could run perpendicular to the main bars.
i would add extra radiused bars at the edge of the deck just to try everything together, and to help with anchorage of any handrails, etc.
obviously, the layout of the main bars has to resist the negative bending moment. i assume the maximum moment is along the straight face of the half circle. if that is the case, i would lay the bars out at right angles to that face to effectivly resist the negative bending moment. provide t & s bars at right angles to the main bars. i probbaly would also add circumferential bars along the outside edge.
just lay bars at right angles sized on the worst cover situation.
check that the 45 degree resultant of the two bars is enough at the 45 degree mark and then you are okay for strength.
circumferential bars are a must top and bottom along the outside edge.
radiused bars are a pain, and imo never get done right.
csd
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
cantilevered concrete beam - applied deflection versus momen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:42 PM
bridge deck removal falsework huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:08 PM
b roof deck vs c floor deck - for floor use huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:07 PM
30mpa parking garage concrete slab vs. 35mpa huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:39 AM
28 day vs. 56 day concrete breaks huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:34 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:40 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多