几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 05:36 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 building dimensions to consider when finding wind loads

building dimensions to consider when finding wind loads?
hello all,
please see attached screenshot for a description of the building. note: building is adjacent to a retaining wall in one direction only. the direction perpendicular to the screenshot is open to the elements. i am curious as to which building dimensions i should consider when finding wind loads? what is usually the approach when one has a building like this? thanks.
wind loads would start from grade up. your height of grade would vary depending upon weather or not the retaining wall is front of the building or not. in other words it would vary depending upon the direction of the wind.
any chance that they could level the surrounding area in the future?
have you checked this area under seismic loads.
i would never desgign the shielded area for zero wind pressure, there will be some wind loads exerted by gusts..

no, leveling the surrounding area will never happen in the future.
i have yet to run a seismic analysis.
i am planning on obtaining wind loads by using the maximum height and width of the building, fairly conservative, but practical. do you think this is a reasonable thing to do?
what about geographic effects from the upwind slope?
i think all that you are saying is justifyable under code but personally i would err a little on the conservative side.

i have one more question that i would like to pose:
when finding net line loads on the roof purlin of a "high rise building", it seems like the canadian code does not have any internal suction/pressure for the roof, except suction for the edge and corners. the suction on the edge/corners counteract the snow load when putting these forces into a combination, which got me thinking...is this the way it should be? also, why would a high rise building (h>120m, h/w>4) not have any internal suction or internal pressure? thanks!
i guess i should reiterate my question to make it more understandable:
1. when finding load applied on roof to find the required cladding capacity, the suction on the roof when placed counteracts when placed in a combination with snow load. am i understanding something wrong here?
2. should i use specified loads when determining loads on cladding? also, should i be using the 1-10 year wind or the 1-50 year?
thanks.
i would design for full height of building and width without considering any shielding of the retaining wall.
1 in 50 year is the design wind for both asd and lrfd.
consider partial snow loading in a place that adds to the wind effect(possibly the leeward side).
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
british wind loading codes huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:19 PM
balcony guardrail wind huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:11 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM
asce 7-98 wind load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:20 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:06 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多