几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:21 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 wind speed-up topographic factor

wind speed-up topographic factor
my question to all is regarding the wind speed-up topographic factor kzt in the asce/sei 7-05 6.5.7.1 & 6.5.7.2
is there are simplified way to address this factor? is this ever just equal to 1 (k1, k2, k3=0)? is this just applied in specific isolated conditions?
i'm a little confused by how i get the h, lh, x & z values in figure 6-4
thanks for any help!
check out our whitepaper library.
bpa827,
these apply to significant geographical features e.g. sea cliffs, escarpements, steep hills, mountains and deep valleys. if you dont have any of these features nearby then just take it as 1.
if you do, then you will need a topographical map to assess some of the factors.
check out
csd72: would a hillside lot qualify as significant geographical features? it sounds like we're talking about some severe topographic changes for this factor to apply.
bpa827
asce 7-05 section 6.5.7.1 has a list of conditions that determine when you need to use the speed-up factor. no. 3 in particular might answer your question. you need a little bit of topographic information to apply the rules.
thanks for the help!
you can play with the factors a bit to help you get a feel for when you can assume it's 1. it doesn't hurt to just study it and see what goes on when you change the inputs.
ucfse: is there a maximum kzt when you go through all the possible combinations of k1, k2 & k3? i think i heard someone say it was 1.8. this is if someone didn't want to go through all the specific details.
you should just use your case. it doesn't make sense to assume you're on top of mt. everest and go from there. that isn't fair to your client and makes your job harder in the end. you have to make everything work.
you probably could do all the substitutions and come up with your equation and then maximize it (take derivatives, set = 0, substitute results and so on, do parametric study). sounds like a lot of work to me. you would be better off calculating them max than to go on hearsay of what someone said. then you'll learn something
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
wind speed in the middle eas huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 10:20 PM
wind directionality factor huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 09:35 PM
emporary wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 01:09 PM
hurricane basic wind speed huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:13 PM
british wind loading codes huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:19 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:46 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多