几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 06:58 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ibc wind load criteria

ibc wind load criteria
i work at a consulting firm in south mississippi where, due to the sudden demand, we are just starting to get involved in some residential construction.
the international building code (r301.2.1.1) specifies that in areas where the basic wind speed exceends 110 mph (in our area it is 150 mph) construction shall be designed in accordance with one of five referenced standards, one of which is the southern building code's standard for hurricane resistant residential construction (sstd 10).
many of the tables in sstd 10 show differing requirements based on wind speed. the wind speeds given are 90, 100, and 110 mph. since the ibc is telling me to design in accordance with sstd 10, i read this to mean that i use the wind speed given by the table in sstd 10, which is 100 mph for my location. otherwise, ibc is telling those of us who live in areas with winds over 110 mph to use a code that only allows for wind loads up to 110 mph.
some clarification would be appreciated.
why don't you use asce 7. to me, it is more straight forward.
does the ibc apply to your residential? in most cases, you would use the irc.
i typically use asce7 for determining all my loads. but there are certain requirements like anchor bolt spacing, etc. that are directly specified by code.
jae, i was actually referring to the irc when i mentioned the ibc. sorry for the confusion!
i believe that the sstd 10 you refer to is using the fastest mile wind (which in the older codes went up to 110 mph at the bottom tip of florida.
the irc uses the 3 second gust speed which for mississippi runs between 140 and 150 on the coast.
table 1609.3.1 shows how the two relate. 110 fm wind is equivalent to 130 3-sec gust. if you are 150 mph (3 sec gust), the fm wind is 130 mph. if the sstd 10 doesn't go up to 130 mph, then perhaps you need another standard to work from. i'm not that familiar with sstd 10 so can't help beyond this.
i don't think it's a question whether or not to use asce7. asce7 is for determining loading.
my understanding, as jae eludes to, is that table 1609.3.1 was added to correlate the windspeeds in order to use the prescriptive methods like sstd. sstd, wfcm, and the other manuals have prescriptive guidelines for acceptable designs. some of the prescriptive methods have limitations on design speeds so you may not be able to use them (see the notes in the code for the exceptions when the prescriptive methods can be used).
so back to your specific question, the code is not telling you that you must use sstd. the code is giving you an option to use sstd. it sounds like the wind loads exceed the exception limits for the use of sstd in your case.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
ibc simplified wind load application huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:54 PM
ibc 1609.1.2 application huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:37 PM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
british wind loading codes huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:19 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:28 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多