几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 07:45 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 welded connection fixity

welded connection fixity
we are currently load rating a truss where the connections are welded using gusset plates. when we input the truss into staad we assumed fully fixed connections at the ends. the resultant moments in the members were relatively small, but since the members bend in the weak axis, the load rating is very low. is there any information out there that discusses partial fixity of such connections?

cazkoop,
do you want to get information of study or experiment about the connection regidity, or how to model semi-rigid connections?
if it is a truss, the connection rigidity (either it is 100% rigid or simple a pin) shouldn't be a significent factor to affect the load rating.
thank you j1d for your response. if there are studies out there on this matter that you know about, that would be great. unfortunately, our load rating does change significantly when we add rigidity to the connection. our staad model gives us moments in the members. even though the moments are small, the
cazkoop,
i don鈥檛 have any document or article about rigidity of steel connection handy. i once wrote a program of concrete flat-plate structure analysis with non-linear 鈥渟prings鈥?to model the column to plate connections. for steel structures, because of the variety, it is harder to have analytical expression of connection rigidity. i know somebody did this kind of study, heavily based on experimental results. maybe more study results are available now.
i don鈥檛 know whether your truss is 2d or 3d. but if the loads are applied to the joints the bending moment anywhere should be pretty small, and even with the beam-column criteria the strength should be dictated mainly by the compression or tension of the critical
cazkoop....remember that your selection of an analysis mode does not dictate the action of the member. the way it is fabricated, erected, and loaded will dictate its reactions, without regard to the way you decide to analyze it.
if there is fixity in the joints, then analyze it so. i'm surprised that your load capacity goes down as compared to pinned joints. are you sure your model is correct? i have seen the opposite in similar analyses. staad is pretty quirky so be careful with your model. do an animation and see how that looks. that will usually tell you if something is amiss in your model.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
welded connection corner of hss huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 07:44 PM
ension on top anchor at welded shear tab connection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 01:17 PM
structural steel connection design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 11:41 AM
partial fixity huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:31 AM
odd beam to column connection 9steel0 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 04:54 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:39 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多