几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 10:53 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 live load reduction for warehouse slab

live load reduction for warehouse slab
if your slab on the ground has some stiffness and is fixed to the piles another consideration than estochastical distribution of the load intervenes, since in such in the end piled-mat piles and mat will be sharing the load.
it is typical in piled-mats to share the load in around halfs, say 40% to 60%, and the proportion even varies with time with the progressive settlement and aging of the concrete. in such case the advice of your colleague would be normally warranted even from merely a structural standpoint.
what above is merely to reckon that some loads will be passed directly to the ground through the slabs even for modest soils.
ubc 94 1606 expressly indicates that for storage areas where ll>4.79kn/m2 no ll reduction is allowed.
if some reduction is to be allowed due to the expected average allocation of the loads you should be able to ascertain of what really the project estimates the loading will be, or some code statement such that above.
argadoo (visitor)19 apr 02 13:23
thank you ishvaaag,
i have a further question, when we design flat slab,the thickness of drop panel will be about slab thickness/6. so if the flat slab is supported directly by plies, the thickness of pile cap will be slab thickness/6 or more? and how deep of pile be embedded in the slab?
argadoo
if for single piles you may add cube pile caps to widen the introduction of the forces, diminishing the punching problem.
other than that, normally you will count with just the depth of the slab aa the punching area, or the depth of the slab where it is constant. respect how much penetration is required, just enough to get bearing and leave enough cover for the bottom main rebar in the mat on the ground, say 6 to 8 cm, or the cover the specification demands.
i have practiced all that here said with in-situ augered-concreted piles with no other problem than some misplaced piles causing some additional embedded beams on the ground work.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
live load reduction for stud walls huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:53 AM
live load reduction factor huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:52 AM
live load reduction two way slabs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:51 AM
heavy live load reduction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 04:02 PM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:33 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多